Reliability and validity of physical examination tests for the assessment of ankle instability

Abstract

Introduction Clinicians rely on certain physical examination tests to diagnose and potentially grade ankle sprains and ankle instability. Diagnostic error and inaccurate prognosis may have important repercussions for clinical decision-making and patient outcomes. Therefore, it is important to recognize the diagnostic value of orthopaedic tests through understanding the reliability and validity of these tests. Objective To systematically review and report evidence on the reliability and validity of orthopaedic tests for the diagnosis of ankle sprains and instability. Methods PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to December 2021. In addition, the reference list of included studies, located systematic reviews, and orthopaedic textbooks were searched. All articles reporting reliability or validity of physical examination or orthopaedic tests to diagnose ankle instability or sprains were included. Methodological quality of the reliability and the validity studies was assessed with The Quality Appraisal for Reliability studies checklist and the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 respectively. We identified the number of times the orthopaedic test was investigated and the validity and/or reliability of each test. Results Overall, sixteen studies were included. Three studies assessed reliability, eight assessed validity, and five evaluated both. Overall, fifteen tests were evaluated, none demonstrated robust reliability and validity scores. The anterolateral talar palpation test reported the highest diagnostic accuracy. Further, the anterior drawer test, the anterolateral talar palpation, the reverse anterior lateral drawer test, and palpation of the anterior talofibular ligament reported the highest sensitivity. The highest specificity was attributed to the anterior drawer test, the anterolateral drawer test, the reverse anterior lateral drawer test, tenderness on palpation of the proximal fibular, and the squeeze test. Conclusion Overall, the diagnostic accuracy, reliability, and validity of physical examination tests for the assessment of ankle instability were limited. Physical examination tests should not be used in isolation, but rather in combination with the clinical history to diagnose an ankle sprain. Preliminary evidence suggests that the overall validity of physical examination for the ankle may be better if conducted five days after the injury rather than within 48 h of injury.

Determining the Quality of Measuring the Level of Lower Extremity Joint Movement in Inclusive Physical Education Using Electronic IT Resources

“…The work presents a development that meets the challenges of modernity in the implementation of monitoring procedures since when restoring functions are lost as a result of an injury when it is extremely important to start recovery quickly, monitoring must be informative and fast. In our study, we were guided by the fact that ankle dorsiflexion range of motion is often emphasized (Powden, Hoch, & Hoch, 2015;Beynon, Le May, & Theroux, 2022) in rehabilitation of lower extremity injuries. To date, there is a certain list of scientific studies where The Weight Bearing Lunge Test has been used to test completely healthy individuals (Konor, Morton, Eckerson, & Grindstaff, 2012;O'Shea, & Grafton, 2013) and athletes (Cady, De Ste Croix, & Deighan, 2021) and as a universal assessment test (Howe, Bampouras, North, & Waldron, 2020).…”