2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12905-020-01127-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and validity of pelvic floor muscle strength assessment using the MizCure perineometer

Abstract: Background The purpose of this study was to clarify the reliability and validity of pelvic floor muscle (PFM) strength assessment using the MizCure perineometer in healthy women. Methods Twenty healthy women (age 20–45 years) participated in this study. The vaginal pressure measured using the MizCure and validated Peritron perineometers were repeated during PFM contraction in the supine and standing positions. All women were evaluated twice by examiners 1 and 2. Following the measurements in the first session… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…33, 34 Pressures measured by the MizCure perineometer were within the range of PFM contraction pressures reported clinically using this device (19 mmHg ± 1 mmHg). 26 Additionally, a resting pressure of 10 mmHg was calibrated and used to evaluate the effect of lower pressures on SMP stent deformation. There are three relevant types of forces exerted on the vaginal canal to consider in the design of an in vitro simulated pelvic model: resting forces, Valsalva forces, and PFM contractions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…33, 34 Pressures measured by the MizCure perineometer were within the range of PFM contraction pressures reported clinically using this device (19 mmHg ± 1 mmHg). 26 Additionally, a resting pressure of 10 mmHg was calibrated and used to evaluate the effect of lower pressures on SMP stent deformation. There are three relevant types of forces exerted on the vaginal canal to consider in the design of an in vitro simulated pelvic model: resting forces, Valsalva forces, and PFM contractions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protocol for pressure assessment was adapted from clinical reports to make direct comparisons between the model and clinical pressure values. 26 A hysteroscope (Endosee) was used to visualize stent expansion and deformation via a scope port near the cervix of the model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%