Reliability and validity of Functional Capacity Evaluation methods: a systematic review with reference to Blankenship system, Ergos work simulator, Ergo-Kit and Isernhagen work system

Gouttebarge, Vincent; Wind, Haije; Kuijer, Paul; Frings‐Dresen, Monique H. W.

doi:10.1007/s00420-004-0549-7

Cited by 102 publications

(69 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…To allow for comparison with other FCE studies, the levels of reliability scale provided by Gouttebarge et al [16] in their review of FCE's, was adopted and levels of reliability were determined as: High for ICC >.90; Moderate 0.75<ICC>0.90; Low<0.75.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Gouttebarge et al [16] rate studies involving more than 2 raters with 10 or more subjects highest in their systematic review of rater reliability of FCEs. Therefore a convenience sample of 12 healthy male and females of working age (18-65 years) was recruited from University staff and associates.…”

Section: Participantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, evidence of FCEs reliability is vital to demonstrate that changes over time in a worker's performance are due to variation in their abilities and not as a result of FCE measurement error and ensure there is confidence in the assessment results [14,15]. Methodological limitations in studies supporting FCE reliability have previously been highlighted [14,16]. Therefore, while it is acknowledged that there are a number of other FCE's available, this study aimed to further evaluate the inter-rater reliability of one FCE, the Valpar Joule Functional Capacity Evaluation [17,18] and to identify any factors potentially effecting inter-rater reliability.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

An investigation of the inter-rater reliability of the Valpar Joule functional capacity evaluation in healthy adults

Mitchell

Hancock

Alexander

2016

WOR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

CopyrightItems in 'OpenAIR@RGU', Robert Gordon University Open Access Institutional Repository, are protected by copyright and intellectual property law. If you believe that any material held in 'OpenAIR@RGU' infringes copyright, please contact openair-help@rgu.ac.uk with details. The item will be removed from the repository while the claim is investigated.© IOS Press, non-commercial use only.1 Title:An investigation of the inter-rater reliability of the Valpar Joule Functional Capacity Evaluation in healthy adults. ABSTRACT BackgroundA functional capacity evaluation (FCE) can provide a comprehensive, objective measure of a worker's ability to meet work demands to support return to work decision making. Research evidence of a FCE's reliability and validity, involving more than one study, and covering all test components with a diverse range of populations, is essential to ensure confidence in any FCE system. ObjectiveThis study aimed to establish the inter-rater reliability of the Valpar Joule FCE functional capacity evaluation (FCE) for which there is currently limited published literature regarding its reliability. MethodsTwelve healthy subjects were digitally recorded completing the initial protocol of the Valpar Joule.Assessments were rated separately by 3 raters and the results then compared. ResultsUsing Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC), with percentages of agreement and t-tests to determine bias, inter-rater reliability was high for determining last safe weight lifted for forceful tasks with ICC'>0.90. Agreement ranged from 97.2%-100% for determining reasons for terminating tests; 97.2%-98.6% for identifying maximum safe capacity, but was only between 8.3% -50% for full agreement for identification of last weight safely lifted in forceful tasks. Differences were identified between raters with different training and experience for identifying poor body mechanics in lifting. ConclusionResults demonstrated high inter-rater reliability for the Valpar Joule functional capacity evaluation in healthy adults. Further development of criteria identifying poor body mechanics and training in its use is recommended to increase evaluator objectivity.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Participantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

An investigation of the inter-rater reliability of the Valpar Joule functional capacity evaluation in healthy adults

Mitchell

Hancock

Alexander

2016

WOR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…FCEs are used in occupational, insurance, and rehabilitation medicine in order to evaluate work ability. Earlier studies show that there is evidence of reliability and some aspects of validity, depending on the FCE protocol [1]. Worldwide there are multiple FCEs using different protocols from different providers which all claim to measure the same construct, namely functional capacity.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Towards Consensus in Operational Definitions in Functional Capacity Evaluation: a Delphi Survey

et al. 2008

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction The problem of inconsistent terminology in functional capacity evaluation (FCE) has been widely addressed in the international literature. Many different terms seem to be used interchangeably while other terms appear to be interpreted differently. This may seriously hinder FCE research and clinical use. To gain consensus in operational definitions in FCE and conceptual framework to classify terminology used in FCE. Methods A Delphi Survey with FCE experts was conducted which consisted of three rounds of questioning, using semi and full structured questions. The expert group was formed from international experts in FCE. Experts were selected if they met any of the following criteria: at least one international publication as first author and one as co-author in the field of FCE; or an individual who had developed an FCE that was subject of investigation in at least one publication in international literature. Consensus of definitions was considered when 75% or more of all experts agreed with a definition.

show abstract

“…Hence, IWS FCE may be considered a valid and reliable instrument for assessing the functional capacity and for providing important information regarding the enhancement of more effective multidisciplinary rehabilitation. 23 However, there is only limited evidence that FCE information can predict the time until RTW. 24,25 Consistent effects regarding a sustained RTW (eg, no additional negative occupational occurrences during follow-up) could not be proved.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Value of Functional Capacity Evaluation Information in a Clinical Setting for Predicting Return to Work

Streibelt

Blume

Thren³

et al. 2009

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Reliability and validity of Functional Capacity Evaluation methods: a systematic review with reference to Blankenship system, Ergos work simulator, Ergo-Kit and Isernhagen work system

Abstract: More rigorous studies are needed to demonstrate the reliability and the validity of FCE methods, especially the BS, EWS and EK.

Cited by 102 publications

References 32 publications

An investigation of the inter-rater reliability of the Valpar Joule functional capacity evaluation in healthy adults

An investigation of the inter-rater reliability of the Valpar Joule functional capacity evaluation in healthy adults

Towards Consensus in Operational Definitions in Functional Capacity Evaluation: a Delphi Survey

Value of Functional Capacity Evaluation Information in a Clinical Setting for Predicting Return to Work

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About