Reliability and Validity of a New Objective Tool for Low Back Pain Functional Assessment

Sánchez‐Zuriaga, Daniel; López-Pascual, Juan; Garrido-Jaén, David; Moya, María Francisca Peydro de; Prat-Pastor, Jaime

doi:10.1097/brs.0b013e3181f471d8

Cited by 44 publications

(42 citation statements)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Pain level and disability were assessed using the VAS and ODI. 3 The Sorensen test is used as method for testing isometric back endurance; it measures how long the subject can maximally maintain the unsupported trunk horizontally while lying prone with a fixed pelvis and, knees and ankles held by straps on a test table (Figure 1). 8,9 The FMS includes seven tasks: a deep squat, hurdle step (right and left), active straight leg raise (right and left), rotary stability (right and left), inline lunge (right and left), push up, and shoulder mobility (right and left) ( Figure 2).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Relationships between Functional Movement Screen, VAS, ODI and Back Endurance in Individual with Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain

Noh¹,

Oh²

2017

J KEMA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Relationships between Functional Movement Screen, VAS, ODI and Back Endurance in Individual with Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain

Noh¹,

Oh²

2017

J KEMA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…About 4-33% of the population suffers LBP, and its lifetime prevalence is 58-84%. Its annual incidence has been estimated in 28 episodes per 1000 persons, with the highest incidence in prime-aged workers (aged 25-64 years) [2]. It is the first cause of work loss and absenteeism [3].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…LBP causes restrictions in physical functioning which may affect the quality of life of individuals [2,[4][5][6]. Physical functioning is a multi dimensional construct covering various aspects of health such as perceived physical functioning, actual physical activity and functional capacity to perform activities [7][8][9].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Physical functioning of low back pain patients: perceived physical functioning and functional capacity, but not physical activity is affected

Rooij

Senden

Heyligers

et al. 2015

Disability and Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Perceived functioning, actual physical activity and functional capacity are three independent outcome dimensions, being complementary but not redundant. Especially, perceived functioning and physical capacity need attention when evaluating LBP patients during rehabilitation. Implications for Rehabilitation Perceived physical functioning and physical capacity are negatively affected by low back pain and improve after treatment. Low back pain patients perform their daily activity independent of pain and complaints. Inertia sensor-based motion analysis can objectify treatment effects showing low back pain patients their progress in rehabilitation. New interventions can be justified with inertia sensor technology in low back pain patients.

show abstract

“…A number of predominantly psychosocial variables [6–8, 11, 17, 18] have been shown to have a relationship with poor outcome and/or work loss in chronic back pain. The majority of such studies however exclude analysis or findings that allow useful application of results to clinical practice.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Value of Pain Coping Constructs in Subcategorising Back Pain Patients according to Risk of Poor Outcome

Harland

Ryan

2013

BioMed Research International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background. Subcategorising patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) could improve patient outcomes and facilitate prioritisation of treatment resources. Objective. This study aimed to develop a subcategorising method for individuals with CLBP using the Coping Strategies Questionnaire 24 (CSQ24) and to investigate the methods potential validity. Methods. 196 patients were recruited from a physiotherapy outpatients department. All participants completed a battery of questionnaires before and after treatment including the CSQ24 and a measure of pain, disability, and mood. At discharge participants also completed a global subjective outcomes scale consisting of a 6-point Likert scale. All participants received usual physiotherapy. Results. Cut-off values for the CSQ24 were calculated using triangulation of the findings from three different statistical methods. Cut-off values were identified for the Catastrophising and Cognitive Coping subscales of the CSQ24. Participants were categorised into low, medium, and high risk of a poor outcome. The cut-off values for these were ≥21 on Cognitive Coping and ≤9 on Catastrophising for low risk and ≤15 on Cognitive Coping for high risk, with all other patients being classified as being at moderate risk. Conclusion. Further validation is required before this approach can be recommended for clinical practice.

show abstract

Reliability and Validity of a New Objective Tool for Low Back Pain Functional Assessment

Abstract: It is possible to distinguish LBP patients from healthy subjects by means of the biomechanical analysis of everyday tasks. This kind of analysis can produce objective and reliable indexes about the patients' degree of functional impairment.

Cited by 44 publications

References 42 publications

Relationships between Functional Movement Screen, VAS, ODI and Back Endurance in Individual with Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain

Relationships between Functional Movement Screen, VAS, ODI and Back Endurance in Individual with Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain

Physical functioning of low back pain patients: perceived physical functioning and functional capacity, but not physical activity is affected

The Value of Pain Coping Constructs in Subcategorising Back Pain Patients according to Risk of Poor Outcome

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About