1993
DOI: 10.1002/jts.2490060405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and validity of a brief instrument for assessing post‐traumatic stress disorder

Abstract: This study examines the psychometric properties of two versions of the PTSD Syrnpton Scale (PSS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

18
827
1
13

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,114 publications
(866 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
18
827
1
13
Order By: Relevance
“…The PTSD diagnosis was established using the Dutch version of the CAPS-IV (Blake et al, 1995; Dutch version: Hovens, Luinge, & Van Minnen, 2005). To measure the severity of PTSD symptoms by self-report, we used the Dutch PTSD Symptom Scale Self Report (PSS-SR) (Foa, Riggs, Dancu, & Rothbaum, 1993; Mol et al, 2005) and the Dutch Impact of Event Scale (IES) (Horowitz, Wilner, & Alvarez, 1979; Van Der Ploeg, Mooren, Kleber, Van Der Velden, & Brom, 2004). Patients’ exposure to traumatic events was identified using a self-report version of the modified Interview for Traumatic Events in Childhood (ITEC) (Lobbestael, Arntz, Harkema-Schouten, & Bernstein, 2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The PTSD diagnosis was established using the Dutch version of the CAPS-IV (Blake et al, 1995; Dutch version: Hovens, Luinge, & Van Minnen, 2005). To measure the severity of PTSD symptoms by self-report, we used the Dutch PTSD Symptom Scale Self Report (PSS-SR) (Foa, Riggs, Dancu, & Rothbaum, 1993; Mol et al, 2005) and the Dutch Impact of Event Scale (IES) (Horowitz, Wilner, & Alvarez, 1979; Van Der Ploeg, Mooren, Kleber, Van Der Velden, & Brom, 2004). Patients’ exposure to traumatic events was identified using a self-report version of the modified Interview for Traumatic Events in Childhood (ITEC) (Lobbestael, Arntz, Harkema-Schouten, & Bernstein, 2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self-reported PTSD symptoms were measured with the PSS-SR (Foa et al, 1993; Dutch translation: Mol et al, 2005). The PSS-SR is a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the frequency of the PTSD symptoms using a four-point Likert scale (0–3, total range 0–51) covering three domains: re-experiencing, avoidance, and arousal.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interrater reliability for a PTSD diagnosis was k  = 0.92, and r  = 0.99 for the total severity score in our study (based on 10% randomly selected interviews). Self-reported PTSD severity was monitored using the Dutch translation of the PTSD Symptom Scale, Self-Report (PSS-SR; Foa, Riggs, Dancu, & Rothbaum, 1993), a 17-item questionnaire to rate the frequency of PTSD symptoms. The internal consistency has been shown to be high (Cronbach’s α = .91; Foa et al, 1993) and the Dutch version has also shown to have good internal consistency (Mol et al, 2005).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potential predictors of treatment outcome were measured at baseline or early treatment and all variables were treated as continuous variables, unless otherwise indicated. Potential predictors were assigned to one of three domains: (1) the demographic domain: age, educational level (primary, secondary, vocational, higher vocational education, or university), and living condition (as a categorical variable: living alone vs. together with partner or other people like children or parents); (2) the clinical domain: PTSD symptom severity as assessed using the PSS-SR (Foa et al, 1993), depressive symptom severity as measured with the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II; Beck, Ward, Mendelson, Mock, & Erbaugh, 1961), dissociative symptom severity as assessed using the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES; Bernstein & Putnam, 1986), current severity of borderline personality disorder manifestations as measured with the Borderline Personality Disorder symptom checklist (BPD-47 symptom checklist; Arntz et al, 2003), and psychoactive medication use (as a categorical variable: yes, no); and (3) the fear habituation domain: fear activation during the first exposure session, calculated as the highest given Subjective Units of Distress (SUD) rating (SUD peak) on a 0–10 point scale (no anxiety to maximum anxiety), within-session fear habituation during the first session, calculated as SUD peak minus the latest SUD rating at the end of the first exposure session, and between-session fear habituation, calculated as the difference between SUD peak scores from the first and second imaginal exposure session (Rauch, Foa, Furr, & Filip, 2004; van Minnen & Hagenaars, 2002). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%