1996
DOI: 10.1017/s0033291700035893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and procedural validity of UM-CIDI DSM-III-R phobic disorders

Abstract: SynopsisWe evaluate the long-term test–retest reliability and procedural validity of phobia diagnoses in the UM-CIDI, the version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview, used in the US National Co-morbidity Survey (NCS) and a number of other ongoing large-scale epidemiological surveys. Test–retest reliabilities of lifetime diagnoses of simple phobia, social phobia, and agoraphobia over a period between 16 and 34 months were K = 0·46, 0·47, and 0·63, respectively. Concordances with the Structured C… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
93
0
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
93
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…All subjects underwent a structured interview (SCID) (Wittchen et al 1996) by an experienced psychiatrist. Subjects were found to be free of any history of mental disorder or somatic disease by means of physical examination, electrocardiogram, electroencephalogram and routine laboratory testing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All subjects underwent a structured interview (SCID) (Wittchen et al 1996) by an experienced psychiatrist. Subjects were found to be free of any history of mental disorder or somatic disease by means of physical examination, electrocardiogram, electroencephalogram and routine laboratory testing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diagnoses were established using CIDI version 2.1, according to DSM-IV criteria (WHO, 1998). The CIDI is a structured interview with acceptable reliability and validity (Wittchen, 1994 ;Wittchen et al 1996). It was administered by specially trained research staff.…”
Section: Study Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these results, refinements were made in the CIDI to improve validity in assessing DSM-III-R disorders . Generally good concordance with blinded clinical diagnoses was found in this revised version of CIDI in the general population of the US Wittchen, 1994;Wittchen et al, 1995;Wittchen et al, 1996). However, the results of CIDI clinical reappraisal studies varied across other settings.…”
Section: B Responding To the Challenges: Validity Of Diagnosesmentioning
confidence: 69%