2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2012.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and plasticity of response inhibition and interference control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
147
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(168 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
19
147
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Before discussing the main findings of the current study, it is important to note that behavioral and neural indices of conflict task performance are characterized by good to excellent test–retest reliability (Clayson and Larson, 2013; Wostmann et al, 2013). Given that high test–retest reliability indicates that a certain measure captures trait-like characteristics (Segalowitz and Barnes, 1993), we consider the relationship between WMC and cognitive control abilities observed in the current study to reflect stable cognitive traits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before discussing the main findings of the current study, it is important to note that behavioral and neural indices of conflict task performance are characterized by good to excellent test–retest reliability (Clayson and Larson, 2013; Wostmann et al, 2013). Given that high test–retest reliability indicates that a certain measure captures trait-like characteristics (Segalowitz and Barnes, 1993), we consider the relationship between WMC and cognitive control abilities observed in the current study to reflect stable cognitive traits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reliability and validity are well documented (34).This variant consisted of eight blocks of 60 trials, each of which began with a fixation cross (500 milliseconds), followed by a series of uppercase and lowercase letters (1000 milliseconds). Participants were instructed to respond whenever a lowercase letter was presented, and to withhold their response whenever an uppercase letter was presented.…”
Section: Go/no-go Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moderate-to-high heritability (Friedman et al, 2008;Stins et al, 2004), as well as strong test-retest reliability and internal consistency (Wöstmann et al, 2013) have been reported for commonly used cognitive control paradigms (eg, Stroop, Eriksen Flanker). In addition, there is evidence of cognitive control impairments in healthy, unaffected twins discordant for MDD (Christensen et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%