2001
DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200107000-00009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and Intraoperative Validity of Preoperative Assessment of Standardized Plain Radiographs in Predicting Bone Loss at Revision Hip Surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
82
2
11

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
82
2
11
Order By: Relevance
“…This study is part of a larger prospective study following all patients treated with TM cups and for this study, we included only patients with contained bone defects in which more than 50% host could not be achieved. All defects were Type II defects according to the classification of Saleh et al [17]. These defects involve dilatation and weakening of the acetabulum, while the columns and rim remain intact [17].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study is part of a larger prospective study following all patients treated with TM cups and for this study, we included only patients with contained bone defects in which more than 50% host could not be achieved. All defects were Type II defects according to the classification of Saleh et al [17]. These defects involve dilatation and weakening of the acetabulum, while the columns and rim remain intact [17].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All defects were Type II defects according to the classification of Saleh et al [17]. These defects involve dilatation and weakening of the acetabulum, while the columns and rim remain intact [17]. We excluded patients who needed structural support in the form of a structural graft or a TM acetabular augment and patients for whom there was no initial stability of the trial component and therefore had the cup protected by an antiprotrusio cage (a cup-cage construct).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acetabular bone loss was classified according to the Gross classification [26]. The revisions requiring a cup-cage were either Type IV, which is an uncontained (segmental) loss of bone stock involving [ 50% of the acetabulum and affecting both columns (26 hips [39%]), or Type V, defined as an acetabular defect in association with pelvic discontinuity (41 hips [61%]).…”
Section: Patient Inclusion and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiographs underestimate bone loss due to osteolysis, with sensitivity for lesion detection ranging from 15-72% depending on size and location [5]. They are also limited by poor interobserver reliability [14,44]. Although there have been advances in the radiographic analysis of wear rates [16,31], these methods still provide indirect evidence of biological reactions and intracapsular pathology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%