2013
DOI: 10.1088/0253-6102/60/1/21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and Efficiency of Generalized Rumor Spreading Model on Complex Social Networks

Abstract: We introduce the generalized rumor spreading model and investigate some properties of this model on different complex social networks. Despite pervious rumor models that both the spreader-spreader (SS) and the spreader-stifler (SR) interactions have the same rate α, we define α (1) and α (2) for SS and SR interactions, respectively. The effect of variation of α (1) and α (2) on the final density of stiflers is investigated. Furthermore, the influence of the topological structure of the network in rumor spreadi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Empirical studies that started about two decades ago fully indicate that most realistic OSNs are heterogeneous rather than homogeneous [20,21]. In the past decade, therefore, much efforts were focused on rumor spreading models based on complex networks [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37]. However, it is uncertain whether these models accurately characterize actual rumor spreading processes, because the models are derived through a series of approximations and do not perfectly accommodate the spreading network [38][39][40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical studies that started about two decades ago fully indicate that most realistic OSNs are heterogeneous rather than homogeneous [20,21]. In the past decade, therefore, much efforts were focused on rumor spreading models based on complex networks [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37]. However, it is uncertain whether these models accurately characterize actual rumor spreading processes, because the models are derived through a series of approximations and do not perfectly accommodate the spreading network [38][39][40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A series of emperical studies starting at the end of last century show that, surprisingly, OSNs are heterogeneous rather than homogeneous [20,21]. From then on, much effort has been put to inspect the spread of rumors on complex networks with the aid of the mean-field theory, with emphasis on the influence of different factors such as the network heterogeneity [22], the nonlinear spreading rate [23], the incubation [24], the memory [25,26], the trust between individuals [27], the countermeasures [28][29][30], the latency [31,32], the time-varying parameters [33], the government punishment [34], the heterogeneous transmission [35] and others [36,37]. As these models are quite rough, their dynamics may severely deviate from the actual rumor spreading process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emperical studies starting at the end of last century fully show that OSNs are heterogeneous rather than homogeneous [15,16]. From then on, a large body of rumor spreading models based on complex networks have been suggested, with emphasis on the combined influence of the basic parameters and the network structures on rumor spreading [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. As these models are established (H 1 ) Due to the influence of a rumor-spreader j, at any time an uncertain person i becomes rumor-spreading at rate β U i j ≥ 0.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%