2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.04.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and agreement between 2 strength devices used in the newly modified and standardized Constant score

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, a review of the CS guidelines was released in 2008 [7]. Moreover, a CS protocol was published by Ban et al [8] This protocol proofed fair inter-rater and intra-rater reliability for patients with shoulder impingement and the evaluation of the reliability and agreement of 2 strength devices [9]. Since the subjective evaluation of shoulder function, especially in the elderly patients, often deviate from the objective score result, a relativization of the absolute score is possible by a comparison with age- and gender-specific norms or the contralateral side, which are described by Constant (1986), Yian (2005) and Katolik (2005) [10–12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a review of the CS guidelines was released in 2008 [7]. Moreover, a CS protocol was published by Ban et al [8] This protocol proofed fair inter-rater and intra-rater reliability for patients with shoulder impingement and the evaluation of the reliability and agreement of 2 strength devices [9]. Since the subjective evaluation of shoulder function, especially in the elderly patients, often deviate from the objective score result, a relativization of the absolute score is possible by a comparison with age- and gender-specific norms or the contralateral side, which are described by Constant (1986), Yian (2005) and Katolik (2005) [10–12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isometric strength testing using a handheld dynamometer is an efficient and inexpensive way for clinicians to measure the strength of a muscle group 2 , 5 , 7 , 8 . Available instruments to measure the isometric strength has been proved to be reliable and show reproducible results 5 , 7 , 9 . Results of isometric strength testing are comparable to isokinetic strength testing which is the gold standard 2 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Load measurements were carried out in 2 trials -3 s each at an interval of 30 s. The intervals between the measurements of successive muscle groups were 3 min. Each measurement was obtained in kilograms [15]. The average test result from 2 trials was converted into Newton's and then converted taking into account the length of the arm of force into the values of the moment of force (torque).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%