2022
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.813058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and Accuracy of 2D Photogrammetry: A Comparison With Direct Measurement

Abstract: ObjectiveFacial anthropometric data is important for the design of respirators. Two-dimensional (2D) photogrammetry has replaced direct anthropometric method, but the reliability and accuracy of 2D photogrammetry has not been quantified. This study aimed to assess inter-rater reliability of 2D photogrammetry and to examine the reliability and accuracy of 2D photogrammetry with direct measurement.DesignA cross-sectional study.SettingMalaysia.ParticipantsA subset of 96 participants aged 18 and above.Primary and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Earlier studies on RFTPs used purely direct measurement techniques whereas our study used a combination of direct and 2D measurement methods. However, it should be noted that 2D photogrammetry was discovered to be a validated tool in our previous published study [15], which was supported by many other previously published papers [16][17][18][19][20][21]. Another limitation of the current study is that, because there have been no previous studies [1,[3][4][5] that grouped the dimensions into three factors, the third factor from the analysis was excluded to make sure our study is comparable with other studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Earlier studies on RFTPs used purely direct measurement techniques whereas our study used a combination of direct and 2D measurement methods. However, it should be noted that 2D photogrammetry was discovered to be a validated tool in our previous published study [15], which was supported by many other previously published papers [16][17][18][19][20][21]. Another limitation of the current study is that, because there have been no previous studies [1,[3][4][5] that grouped the dimensions into three factors, the third factor from the analysis was excluded to make sure our study is comparable with other studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…This method allows for better reproducibility than direct anthropometrical measurements but accuracy depends greatly on the photography setup. 22 The most recent method to perform anthropometrical measurements adds another dimension to photogrammetry and is called stereophotogrammetry. [23][24][25][26] Stereophotogrammetry allows analysis of the three-dimensional surface of the face.…”
Section: Anthropometrical Measurement Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anthropometric dimensions were calculated using the software package Digimizer version 5.4.4. Details of 2D photogrammetry methods can be found in previously published paper (22). This method has been found to have high reliability (ICC ranged between 0.85 and 0.99), and high validity as demonstrated by the Bland-Altman analyses for the seven head and facial dimensions.…”
Section: Photogrammetry Procedures For Seven Head and Facial Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 98%