2015
DOI: 10.3233/ifs-151947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability analysis of turbine blades based on fuzzy response surface method

Abstract: Abstract.To improve the precision of reliability analysis on turbine blades, the fuzzy response surface method of reliability analysis is proposed by considering the fuzziness of the input variables and the vagueness of the limit state variables. Initially, the fuzzy basic variables were converted into equivalent random variables according to the method of equivalent transformation. Additionally, the mathematic model of the fuzzy response surface for structural reliability analysis was established, based on th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16,17 The dynamic comprehensive reliability analysis of multi-failure modes is obtained by simulating multi-extremum response surface models by using linkage Monte Carlo (MC) method. 18,19
Figure 2.Flow chart of probabilistic analysis based on MERSM.
Figure 3.Sample set generated with central composite design. Note: { x i } i = 1,2 is the i th random input variable; the round dot denotes computational point; the square dot are samples of random input variables; {#x000B5; i } i = 1,2 and {#963; i } i = 1,2 are respectively the mean and standard deviation of the ith random input variable; f is the interpolation coefficient.
…”
Section: Multi-extremum Response Surface Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,17 The dynamic comprehensive reliability analysis of multi-failure modes is obtained by simulating multi-extremum response surface models by using linkage Monte Carlo (MC) method. 18,19
Figure 2.Flow chart of probabilistic analysis based on MERSM.
Figure 3.Sample set generated with central composite design. Note: { x i } i = 1,2 is the i th random input variable; the round dot denotes computational point; the square dot are samples of random input variables; {#x000B5; i } i = 1,2 and {#963; i } i = 1,2 are respectively the mean and standard deviation of the ith random input variable; f is the interpolation coefficient.
…”
Section: Multi-extremum Response Surface Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of the FS has also received considerable attention from system reliability analysis researchers such as Mahapatra and Roy ( 2012 ), Pan et al. ( 2015 ), Pramanik et al. ( 2019 ) and El-Damcese et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimation methods for reliability characteristics must be modified based on the fuzzy lifetimes to attain a more realistic analysis and exploit the uncertainty or imprecision in the data. The concept of the FS has also received considerable attention from system reliability analysis researchers such as Mahapatra and Roy (2012), Pan et al (2015), Pramanik et al (2019) and El-Damcese et al (2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical simulation-based probability analysis approaches are the most applied for fatigue life prediction and reliability evaluation. The probability analysis methods mainly include first-order reliability method (FORM) (Cornell 1970), second-order reliability method (SORM) (Fu 2018), response surface method (RSM) (Pan 2015), Monte-Carlo method (MCM) (Alessandri 2018) and distributed collaborative response surface method (DCRSM) (Gao 2015(Gao , 2016(Gao , 2018(Gao and 2019. However, the primary differences among the approaches are numerical accuracy and computation efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%