2018
DOI: 10.1142/s0218539318500195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability Analysis of DKNCP Systems with a Mixture of Degrading Components Subjected to Different Types of Shocks

Abstract: This paper attempts to model the reliability of dynamic k-out-of-n systems with component partnership (DKNCP) in which a mixture of deteriorating components and multiple types of shocks are inflicted on the system. Previous studies were merely focused on the DKNCP systems affected by one type of shock that influenced all its components. In practice, however, shocks do not necessarily affect all the components. Hence, shocks may be classified based on their magnitude, specifications, and the components they aff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, S. Eryilmaz et al [6] classified shocks into small type and extreme type and then compared the cumulative magnitude with a threshold to obtain the distribution of the failure time. The other supposes that different failure thresholds correspond to different failure modes, considering the competitive risk of cumulative magnitudes caused by multiple shocks in different failure modes [7,8]. As the complexity of the modeling method increases, analytical methods usually fail to meet their demands.…”
Section: Figure 1 Traditional Shock Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, S. Eryilmaz et al [6] classified shocks into small type and extreme type and then compared the cumulative magnitude with a threshold to obtain the distribution of the failure time. The other supposes that different failure thresholds correspond to different failure modes, considering the competitive risk of cumulative magnitudes caused by multiple shocks in different failure modes [7,8]. As the complexity of the modeling method increases, analytical methods usually fail to meet their demands.…”
Section: Figure 1 Traditional Shock Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%