2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.04.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability analysis of a two-unit general parallel system with warm standbys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that while using one or two spares are very typical in practical standby system designs [6,10,29,48,49], larger values of N (6 and 11) are used here to show efficiency and effectiveness of the proposed algorithm.…”
Section: Example Of Mission Reliability and Expected Cost Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that while using one or two spares are very typical in practical standby system designs [6,10,29,48,49], larger values of N (6 and 11) are used here to show efficiency and effectiveness of the proposed algorithm.…”
Section: Example Of Mission Reliability and Expected Cost Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The warm-standby model provides an effective and flexible solution to trade-off these two conflicting design objectives [9][10][11]. Specifically, in a warm-standby system, an element while in the standby mode is partially powered and exposed to operational stresses and is partially ready to take over the task when an online unit becomes faulty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7(b), the system probability is calculated by In addition to the evaluation method based on the path probabilities, the system reliability can also be obtained with an upwards (or bottom-up) evaluation algorithm. In this algorithm, the occurrence probability of each node in the MDD is calculated in an upwards manner, as shown in (6) at the bottom of the page. The probabilities of sink node 1, and sink node 0 are simply 1, and 0, respectively.…”
Section: System Mdd Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some models assume cold standby units can be damaged in storage, or fail due to conditions while in storage, most models do not study this behavior. Warm standby can be seen as a generalization of cold and hot standby [6]- [8]. Generally, the cold standby redundancy provides higher system reliability compared with an analogous hot or warm standby system because the lifetime of the component is not consumed at all in the cold standby state [9]- [11] (again, due to common modeling assumptions).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chander and Mukendar [6] discussed reliability and economic measures of a 2-out-of-3 redundant system subject to degradation of units. A parallel (2, n-2) (2, n-2)-system was investigated by Papageorgiou and Kokolakis [22], where two units start their operation simultaneously and any one of them is replaced instantaneously upon its failure by one of the (n-2) (n-2) warm standby. El-Said and El-Sherbeny [11] investigated the cost-benefit analysis of a two-unit cold standby system with two-stage repair of a failed unit and discussed the concept of waiting time with two-stage repair for a two-unit cold standby system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%