2020
DOI: 10.1177/0278364920907151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability analysis of a tendon-driven actuation for soft robots

Abstract: The reliability of soft robotic devices will be the bottleneck that slows their commercialization. In particular, fatigue failure issues are a major concern. Thus, reliability should be taken into account from the earliest stages of development. However, to date, there have been no attempts to analyze the reliability of soft robotic devices in a systematic manner. When soft robots are employed to force transmission applications, reliability is typically a dominant issue, since soft robotic structures are const… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The developed RAS features high durability of > 20,000 cycles before the first failure occurs, which allowed its application without technical issues for several hours in user studies in out-of-the-lab scenarios. While many research projects target the translation to out-of-the-lab applications (e.g., home use), the durability of RAS is rarely evaluated, allowing limited insight into applicability and usability of developed wearable assistive devices (Jeong et al, 2020 ). Often, durability is only reported for specific components, e.g., a battery runtime of 3.8 h powering a soft robotic glove in Polygerinos et al ( 2015 ), or 5,000 cycles for fluidic fabric muscle sheets intended to be integrated as an output in wearable soft robotics in Zhu et al ( 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The developed RAS features high durability of > 20,000 cycles before the first failure occurs, which allowed its application without technical issues for several hours in user studies in out-of-the-lab scenarios. While many research projects target the translation to out-of-the-lab applications (e.g., home use), the durability of RAS is rarely evaluated, allowing limited insight into applicability and usability of developed wearable assistive devices (Jeong et al, 2020 ). Often, durability is only reported for specific components, e.g., a battery runtime of 3.8 h powering a soft robotic glove in Polygerinos et al ( 2015 ), or 5,000 cycles for fluidic fabric muscle sheets intended to be integrated as an output in wearable soft robotics in Zhu et al ( 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, an additional step to connect the output of the RAS to the assistive device is required. Regarding technical maintenance, this modularity of cable-based RAS is beneficial, allowing quick repair or replacement of specific components of the RAS since structural failures are very common along the transmission path, e.g., especially breaking of the cable (Jeong et al, 2020 ). The increased wear and tear of soft pneumatic and hydraulic actuators, artificial muscles, bellows, and cylinders leads to an increased need for replacement compared to cable-based RAS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Jeong et al developed a lifetime model for tendon-driven soft actuators. The model was validated extensively through experiments under various levels of actuation stresses.…”
Section: Experimental Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%