2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-13672-6_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relevant Gene Selection Using Normalized Cut Clustering with Maximal Compression Similarity Measure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The biggest advantage of this technique, the comprehensive gene set, is also its main pitfall as the imbalance between a large number of genes and a handful of biological samples transforms the analysis step into the bottleneck of the microarray technology . Furthermore, technical variations (dye bias and array variability) and biological noise (signal variations) challenge accurate analysis (Bala et al 2010). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biggest advantage of this technique, the comprehensive gene set, is also its main pitfall as the imbalance between a large number of genes and a handful of biological samples transforms the analysis step into the bottleneck of the microarray technology . Furthermore, technical variations (dye bias and array variability) and biological noise (signal variations) challenge accurate analysis (Bala et al 2010). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%