Abstract:The MTJ of the biceps begins further proximal than may be appreciated intraoperatively. Knowledge of the anatomic relationships between the LHBT, its MTJ, and the pectoralis major tendon provides helpful guidelines for the biceps tenodesis site. The final resting spot of the most distal aspect of the MTJ of the LHBT after tenodesis should be approximately 3 cm distal to the inferior edge of the pectoralis major tendon footprint on the humerus.
“…A recent anatomic study by Lafrance et al 43 described the height of the pectoralis major tendon to be 3.73 AE 0.83 cm in the region of the biceps tendon, where open subpectoral tenodesis is performed. Combining this with the measurements of Murachovsky et al, 44 the average distance from the top of the humerus to the inferior border of the pectoralis major tendon is 8.49 cm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,39 Additionally, there has been increasing recognition that restoration of the anatomic length-tension relationship of the long head biceps is a critical aspect of the tenodesis procedure. 22,42,43 These data are valuable to orthopaedic surgeons using these techniques, because little data exist guiding practitioners regarding the differences in these commonly used methods.…”
“…A recent anatomic study by Lafrance et al 43 described the height of the pectoralis major tendon to be 3.73 AE 0.83 cm in the region of the biceps tendon, where open subpectoral tenodesis is performed. Combining this with the measurements of Murachovsky et al, 44 the average distance from the top of the humerus to the inferior border of the pectoralis major tendon is 8.49 cm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,39 Additionally, there has been increasing recognition that restoration of the anatomic length-tension relationship of the long head biceps is a critical aspect of the tenodesis procedure. 22,42,43 These data are valuable to orthopaedic surgeons using these techniques, because little data exist guiding practitioners regarding the differences in these commonly used methods.…”
“…Restoration of the anatomic LHBT length-tension relation is a principal consideration when performing BT, particularly if considering cosmesis and secondary function. 7,8 Denard et al 8 suggested that the normal anatomic station can be maintained when the LHBT is reinserted at the proximal articular margin of the bicipital groove with a 25-mm bone socket and minimal tendon resection. However, tenodesis at this site largely precludes assessment of the LHBT musculotendinous junction, which typically begins 2.2 cm distal to the proximal edge of the pectoralis major tendon insertion.…”
Section: See Related Article On Page 23mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, tenodesis at this site largely precludes assessment of the LHBT musculotendinous junction, which typically begins 2.2 cm distal to the proximal edge of the pectoralis major tendon insertion. 7 Of concern, Werner et al 9 reported that suprapectoral BT was frequently associated with over-tensioning of the LHBT, resulting in decreased load to failure and a greater incidence of failure by implant pullout compared with subpectoral BT. Conversely, Forsythe et al 6 found no incidence of bicipital complications in either cohort, and statistically significant improvements in functional scores were found in both cohorts without notable differences in any primary or secondary outcome measures.…”
The contemporary management of biceps-labral pathology has increasingly transitioned toward primary treatment of the long head of the biceps tendon, largely in response to more consistent outcomes relative to SLAP repair and so-called benign neglect. Accordingly, there has been renewed interest in evaluating relevant differences between varying operative techniques and constructs for biceps tenodesis, including an array of subacromial, intra-articular, suprapectoral, and subpectoral methods. Among these, arthroscopic suprapectoral tenodesis and mini-open subpectoral tenodesis remain in contention for "best in show," albeit with distinctly different merits and risks. Important considerations with either technique include restoration of the native length-tension relation, avoidance of perioperative complications, surgical-site morbidity, and technical ease. Dogma aside, surgeons facile with both techniques can confidently counsel their patients on the comparable short-term results after suprapectoral or subpectoral biceps tenodesis.
“…8,9 Não há um consenso claro sobre o melhor tratamento cirúrgico para lesões do TCLB 10 Além disso, não existe um método consistente para assegurar o restauro da tensão bicipital adequada no período pós-operatório. 11 Nosso objetivo foi determinar a presença de IG no músculo bíceps braquial após o tratamento das lesões do TCLB (tenodese ou tenotomia) e estabelecer uma relação entre essa possível IG e alterações no comprimento da fibra muscular, presença de deformidades e força.…”
Resumo
Objetivo O objetivo do presente estudo foi determinar a existência de infiltração gordurosa (IG) na massa muscular do bíceps braquial após a tenotomia ou tenodese para tratamento de lesão no tendão da cabeça longa do bíceps e estabelecer uma relação entre a IG e alterações no comprimento das fibras musculares.
Métodos Análise clínica e de imagens de 2 grupos de pacientes (submetidos à tenodese do bíceps [16 indivíduos] ou tenotomia do bíceps [15 indivíduos]). Nos dois grupos, os achados foram comparados àqueles do lado contralateral de cada indivíduo (grupo controle). Todos os pacientes foram submetidos à tenodese ou tenotomia unilateral do bíceps, com acompanhamento pós-operatório > 1 ano. Exames de ressonância magnética (RM) foram realizados em ambos os braços de cada paciente de acordo com um protocolo específico. A força de flexão do cotovelo foi medida com dinamômetro manual e os resultados foram submetidos à análise estatística.
Resultados O período pós-operatório médio antes da realização da RM foi de 5 anos, e nenhum caso de IG foi observado no compartimento anterior de ambos os braços dos pacientes avaliados. Sete pacientes apresentaram deformidade moderada ou grave no braço operado. Não houve relação significativa entre deformidade do braço (p = 0,077), percentual de força de flexão (p = 0,07) ou dor à palpação do sulco bicipital (p = 0,103).
Conclusão Nenhum dos pacientes avaliados apresentou evidência de IG na massa muscular do compartimento anterior do braço após os procedimentos. Não foi possível estabelecer uma correlação entre a discrepância do comprimento do músculo bíceps, medido à RM, e a presença de IG no compartimento anterior do braço.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.