Relevansi Hak Angket Terhadap Komisi Negara Independen

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji dua hal. Pertama, prinsip checks and balances komisi negara independen. Kedua, relevansi hak angket dengan komisi negara independen. Penelitian ini merupakan normative legal research, dengan pendekatan historis, konseptual, kasus, dan yuridis. Objek studi terhadap komisi negara independen meliputi KY,KPU, dan KPK. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan, (1)Tidak ada satupun komisi negara independen yang menegasikan paham konstitusionalisme. Masing-masing komisi negara independen melaksanakan fungsi checks and balances. (2) Tidak terdapat relevansi antara hak angket dengan komisi negara independen (KY-KPU-KPK). Secara historis, konseptual, dan yuridis normatif, membuktikan bahwa komisi negara independen tidak dapat menjadi subjek hak angket.

The Concept of Constitutional Importance to Human Rights in Indonesia

“…[2] State institutions in Indonesia are regulated in several forms, namely State institutions that are regulated and formed by the constitution are constitutional organs, state institutions that are regulated and formed by law are legal organs, while state institutions formed based on Presidential decrees then the degree of legal treatment of officials sitting in them as well as institutions formed at the level of regional regulations. [3] State institutions whose positions at the constitutional level are the President, Vice President, People's Representative Council, Regional Representative Council, People's Consultative Assembly, Constitutional Court, Supreme Court, and Audit Board. [4] The authority of the above state institutions is regulated directly in the constitution, namely the constitution, and is specified again in law, although the appointment of its members is determined through a presidential decree as the highest state administration official.…”

Legal Reconstruction of State Institutionalities of State Commissions to Suppress the Potential of Institutional Authority Dispute

“…This symptom is almost endemic in every country that carried out constitutional reform after undergoing a process of transition from authoritarian to democracy (Arjomand, 2003). The presence of new state institutions, including state commission known as state auxiliary organs, is the consequence of the redistribution of power that was personal in the past, developing towards impersonal (Rishan, 2018). Moreover, these independent state commission agencies, if judging from its nature and authority, in some state administration law in America is called the Fourth Branch of Government (Arbani, 2018).…”