2011 2nd International Conference on Computer and Communication Technology (ICCCT-2011) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/iccct.2011.6075169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relevancy tag ranking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Agrawal and Chaudhary [1] proposed a relevance tag ranking algorithm to rank tag automatically based on their relevance with image content. Li et al [2] presented a tag relevance fusion method to solve limitations of a single measurement of tag relevance.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agrawal and Chaudhary [1] proposed a relevance tag ranking algorithm to rank tag automatically based on their relevance with image content. Li et al [2] presented a tag relevance fusion method to solve limitations of a single measurement of tag relevance.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…supported these initial efforts,Lee and Neve [26] described information about the a variant of the popular baseline neighbor voting algorithm for image retrieval process Agrawal and Chaudhary [24] described information about tag ranking algorithm as per image content. Zhu et al [25] described information about the adaptive teleportation random walk model for voting graph its design based on relationships between image tags.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors of [17] discuss a data-driven approach for ranking the tags assigned to an image, taking into account the size of the objects shown in the image. In order to determine the size of the objects shown, image segmenta-…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors of [18] present a tag ranking method that combines a visual attention model with multi-instance learning, following a three-step procedure: 1) use of multi-instance learning to propagate global image tags to local image regions; 2) use of visual attention modeling to estimate the importance of the different image regions; and 3) ranking of the tags according to the saliency values of the corresponding image regions. Both [17] and [18] make use of image segmentation, a process that is still highly inaccurate. In addition, [18] needs a saliency map, which adds to the computational complexity.…”
Section: An Image Folksonomymentioning
confidence: 99%