Proceedings of the 28th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval 2005
DOI: 10.1145/1076034.1076106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relevance weighting for query independent evidence

Abstract: A query independent feature, relating perhaps to document content, linkage or usage, can be transformed into a static, per-document relevance weight for use in ranking. The challenge is to find a good function to transform feature values into relevance scores. This paper presents FLOE, a simple density analysis method for modelling the shape of the transformation required, based on training data and without assuming independence between feature and baseline. For a new query independent feature, it addresses th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
129
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
129
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular raw biometric scores and various nonlinear transformations of the biometric readings are explored. A particularly promising technique is presented in [5] where a sigmoid functional form is used to transform PageRank, link indegree, ClickDistance and URL length into static scores. This technique forms part of our investigation.…”
Section: Towards Static Biometric Scoresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular raw biometric scores and various nonlinear transformations of the biometric readings are explored. A particularly promising technique is presented in [5] where a sigmoid functional form is used to transform PageRank, link indegree, ClickDistance and URL length into static scores. This technique forms part of our investigation.…”
Section: Towards Static Biometric Scoresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…using the term frequency in specific fields of structured documents (e.g. title, abstract) [11], or integrating query-independent evidence in the retrieval model in the form of prior probabilities for a document [3,6] ('prior' because they are known before the query). In short, when determining the relevance between a query and a document, most IR models use primarily query-dependent term statistics, and sometimes also add query-independent evidence to further enhance retrieval performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, priors are combined with the retrieval model either using heuristics or handtuned parameters [3]. In this work, we combine our proposed priors with the LM in two different ways: using a standard logarithmic combination, and proposing a novel combination that considers the prior as a measure of the risk of accepting the score given by the query likelihood estimation of the LM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it proved non-trivial to include query-independent features such as PageRank and inlink count into the BM25 ranking formula [6]. Therefore, a model that can handle arbitrary query-dependent and query-independent features is desirable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%