1996
DOI: 10.1016/0167-7012(96)83753-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relevance of nucleic acid amplification techniques for the diagnosis of respiratory tract infections in the clinical laboratory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
46
1
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
3
46
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Ieven and Goossens (29) stated that some investigators ascribe the different results obtained by different methodologies when using the same sample to the unequal distribution of mycobacteria present in sputum and the difficulty in obtaining perfect sample homogeneity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ieven and Goossens (29) stated that some investigators ascribe the different results obtained by different methodologies when using the same sample to the unequal distribution of mycobacteria present in sputum and the difficulty in obtaining perfect sample homogeneity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Buijtels and Petit (33), mycobacterial growth is highly affected by the process of sample decontamination; however, this procedure is very important because sputum contains a variety of microorganisms that can grow much faster than MTB. Other studies have shown that this procedure kills 70 to 90% of viable bacilli, changing the low viability of the sample both for culture and for PCR (29,33).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies of the evaluation of the performance of these kits have revealed that the specificity was excellent, while the sensitivity has varied widely (2,13,22 divergency may result from the way of selecting clinical specimens (i.e., those from patients before or during treatment) and the means of evaluation, where sensitivity and specificity were based on bacteriologic evidence or clinical diagnosis. Given these concerns, a relevant diagnostic value of these assays in an actual clinical setting has not been well established (2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of investigators have reported the usefulness of nucleic acid amplification methods to detect M. tuberculosis from clinical specimens (1,3,5,10,15,22,27,29,30,33,37,41). A PCR-based Roche Amplicor Mycobacterium system (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) for detecting M. tuberculosis, M. avium and M. intracellulare and an rRNA amplification-based Gen-Probe Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test system (GenProbe Inc., San Diego, Calif., U.S.A.) for detecting M. tuberculosis are now commercially available (1, 2, 4, 6-9, 11, 12, 18-20, 22-24, 29, 31, 34-36, 38-40).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 Their greatest potential utility is anticipated for the detection of M. pneumoniae, Leigionella species and selected pathogens that infrequently colonize the upper airways in the absences of disease.…”
Section: Dna Probes and Amplificationmentioning
confidence: 99%