Cracks and Fracture 1976
DOI: 10.1520/stp28637s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relevance of Nonlinear Fracture Mechanics to Creep Cracking

Abstract: Creep crack growth tests, conducted on contoured double cantilever beam (DCB) specimens are described for aluminium alloy RR58 and a chromium-molybdenum-vanadium steel. The results are analyzed in terms of ˙J, the rate equivalent of the J contour integral, which is a nonlinear fracture mechanics parameter. Direct proportionality is found between crack growth rate, ˙a and ˙J. The treatment is shown to reveal a unification of the linear elastic fracture mechanics and net section or reference stress descriptions … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
58
0
1

Year Published

1980
1980
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
58
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A major feature of these studies is the development of a parameter that characterizes the crack tip fields as well as crack propagation. Under steady state creep conditions, the so called C * -integral (Landes and Begley 1976;Nikbin et al 1976;Ohji et al 1976) (i.e. the creep J -integral, Rice 1978) can be used to characterize the crack tip fields and creep crack growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A major feature of these studies is the development of a parameter that characterizes the crack tip fields as well as crack propagation. Under steady state creep conditions, the so called C * -integral (Landes and Begley 1976;Nikbin et al 1976;Ohji et al 1976) (i.e. the creep J -integral, Rice 1978) can be used to characterize the crack tip fields and creep crack growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Riedel 1981;Tvergaard 1984) or strain-rate field (e.g. Cocks and Ashby 1981;Nikbin et al 1984) is the same as that for the undamaged material and used either empirical or mechanistic damage growth laws to determine the crack growth rate. In the strain based models the critical damage at the crack tip is expressed in terms of a material ductility (strain to failure) which is a function of the local stress state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The creep crack growth being an inelastic process, net section stress on (2) and reference stress 0 r (3) have been used to correlate with creep crack growth rates. In 1976, based on the modification of the J integral, a C* integral was suggested to be an appropriate parameter for creep crack growth (4)(5)(6)(7). However, the C* integral represents only the amplitude of the stress strain field ahead of the crack tip when a material is in steady state creep, but the stress relaxation around the crack tip due to creep deformation and crack propagation causes a nonsteady state creep process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the creep crack growth rates measured from C(T) and M(T) specimens differed from each other. Attempts to find J-like parameters to correlate creep crack growth rates were also made in Europe (Nikbin et al 1976) and in Japan (Taira et al 1979) but the association with crack tip stress fields was not recognized in these studies. Saxena (1980) showed that creep crack growth rates were uniquely correlated with C * -Integral for C(T) and M(T) specimens for 304 stainless steel at 594 • C (1,100 • F) because the necessary conditions of widespread steady-state creep (a term interchangeably used with secondary creep in the literature and here) were established shortly after loading and the creep crack growth rate occurred primarily under this tailor-made conditions for C * to describe the crack tip conditions.…”
Section: Early Developments In Tdfmmentioning
confidence: 99%