2012
DOI: 10.1089/aid.2011.0111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relevance of Early Detection of HIV Type 1 SI/CXCR4-Using Viruses in Vertically Infected Children

Abstract: The aim of the study was to investigate the prevalence and persistence of syncytium-inducing (SI) strains in HIV-1-infected children along time of infection and to evaluate the influence of antiretroviral therapy and host factors on viral tropism. This is a retrospective analysis carried out in 267 HIV-1 vertically infected children from an Argentinean cohort. The viral phenotype was screened in MT-2 cells and coreceptor usage confirmed by the GHOST cell assay. Also, CD4(+) T cell count, viral load, antiretrov… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(65 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have presented the concordance between genotypic tropism testing based on plasma viral RNA and proviral DNA and reported the concordance rates ranging from 79% to 97% . Many studies determined the prevalence of HIV‐1 coreceptor usage in HIV‐1 infected children; they have shown that either R5 or X4 viruses can be highly observed using proviral DNA or plasma RNA . Moreover, the HIV‐1 coreceptor usage in children may be influenced by age, HIV‐1 subtypes, or antiretroviral receiving.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies have presented the concordance between genotypic tropism testing based on plasma viral RNA and proviral DNA and reported the concordance rates ranging from 79% to 97% . Many studies determined the prevalence of HIV‐1 coreceptor usage in HIV‐1 infected children; they have shown that either R5 or X4 viruses can be highly observed using proviral DNA or plasma RNA . Moreover, the HIV‐1 coreceptor usage in children may be influenced by age, HIV‐1 subtypes, or antiretroviral receiving.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HIV‐1 coreceptor usage has been broadly studied in HIV‐1 infected adults and few studies in the newborns or pediatric patients have been performed. Epidemiologic studies of HIV‐1 coreceptor usage among children in Uganda, Argentina, France, Spain, Italy, and India have shown that the distribution of HIV‐1 coreceptor usage is likely to be different because the majority of HIV‐1 infected children harbored R5 viruses, but some harbored X4 viruses . However, no data about HIV‐1 coreceptor usage in HIV‐1 infected children in Thailand have been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite of that only a limited number of studies have explored the relationships between the diversity of the CCR5 encoding gene and the prevalence of X4 tropic viruses. Crudeli et al demonstrated that people who were CCR5 -δ32 heterozygotes (HHG*2) had higher rates of X4 tropic viruses than those not having this genotype in the acute phase of infection 10 . Altamirano et al demonstrated that all wild type homozygotes for CCR5 SNP G303A had NSI virus while all SI variants were found in individuals with A/A or A/G genotypes (HHE-HHF*2) 11 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Crudeli et al demonstrated that the presence of SI viruses was associated with CCR5 -Δ32 genotype (i.e. HHG*2) at the acute phase but not in the later stages of HIV infection 10 . Another study has shown that CCR5 HHE/HHF*2 was associated with the presence of SI viruses 11 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study by D'Aquila et al, syncythium-inducing viruses, reflecting infection with X4 tropic populations, were more common among CCR5 Δ32/wild type (wt) heterozygotes compared with CCR5 wt/wt [22]. Infection with X4 isolates was found to be more frequent among CCR5 Δ32/wt children with acute HIV infection; however, this association was lost in cases of chronic infection [23]. Also, Brumme et al reported that CCR5 Δ32/wt heterozygosity was associated with a 2.5 times higher risk of harbouring X4 variants [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%