2010
DOI: 10.2310/6620.2010.09047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relevance of Doubtful (“Equivocal”) Late Patch-Test Readings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At any rate, assessment of clinical relevance cannot refer to future events. Therefore, even sensitizations of doubtful relevance should be disclosed to the patient in order to enable him/her to actively avoid these substances .…”
Section: Test Reading and Interpretation Of Test Reactions (Especiallmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At any rate, assessment of clinical relevance cannot refer to future events. Therefore, even sensitizations of doubtful relevance should be disclosed to the patient in order to enable him/her to actively avoid these substances .…”
Section: Test Reading and Interpretation Of Test Reactions (Especiallmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In jedem Fall kann sich die Einschätzung der klinischen Relevanz nicht auf die Zukunft beziehen. Daher sollte auch eine Sensibilisierung unklarer Relevanz in die Patientenaufklärung zur Substanzmeidung einbezogen werden .…”
Section: Ablesung Der Testung Und Interpretation Von Testreaktionen (unclassified
“…Notably, the 'pull test' is most useful for compounds that cause homogenous erythema with fine surface epidermal enhancement (wrinkling) [namely, PG, CAPB, and FRPs], as opposed to those that create poral reactions [patchy follicular reactions (eg: cobalt)]. Correct diagnosis of a 'doubtful' (equivocal) reaction is especially important in patients with impaired barriers, as they have lower irritancy thresholds [4,5].…”
Section: Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%