2019
DOI: 10.1108/cg-11-2016-0204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relevance of corporate boards in driving performance in the period that covers financial crisis

Abstract: Purpose of the study: This study examines the relevance of boards in driving firm level performance. For this purpose, it considers firms listed on Ireland and Spain stock exchanges for the period to 2014, over a period that includes the global financial crisis. Design/methodology/approach: This study uses panel data regression analysis to analyse the effects of board characteristics on performance and also uses alternate model specifications to test the significance of robustness of relationships. Findings: T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(72 reference statements)
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results lend support to the pecking order hypothesis which postulates that profitable firms prefer to depend on retained earnings than external debt financing (Myers and Majluf, 1984). Similar evidence is also reported by Duppati et al (2018) and Yasser et al (2017).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results lend support to the pecking order hypothesis which postulates that profitable firms prefer to depend on retained earnings than external debt financing (Myers and Majluf, 1984). Similar evidence is also reported by Duppati et al (2018) and Yasser et al (2017).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…There is a positive relationship between firm size and firm performance for the full study period and periods before and after the GFC. This is consistent with Duppati et al (2018) and Pervan and Višić (2012), which indicates that larger firms are able to perform better. This is further explained by the traditional neoclassical view of the firm which states that larger firms have bigger economies of scale because they can spread the fixed costs over larger units, obtain funds at lower cost of financing and have better specialization and division of labor (Pervan and Višić, 2012).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, O'Connell and Cramer(2010)find a strong positive association between board independence and firm performance for Irish firms. Joh and Jung (2012) find that board independence positively affects firm value in a sample of Korean firms; however, they document that this positive relationship exists when there are low information transaction costs Duppati et al (2019). conclude that there is a positive relationship between board independence and firm performance in Spanish firms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Notes1 Please seeAllam (2018),Hanafi et al (2018),Duppati et al (2019) andVallascas et al (2017) 2 www.bankofengland.co.uk/prudential-regulation 3 www.frc.org.uk/directors/corporate-governance-and-stewardship/uk-corporate-governance-code 4 www.frc.org.uk/about-the-frc/covid-19 5 www.theguardian.com/business/live/2020/mar/31/china-economy-picks-up-covid-19-german-une mployment-us-confidence-stock-markets-business-live 6 www.britishairways.com/en-gb/information/incident/coronavirus/latest-information 7 www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-52367295…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%