Relevance of CONSORT reporting criteria for research on eHealth interventions

Abstract

Objective In 1996, 2001, and 2010, the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) group released criteria for reporting critical information about randomized clinical trials (1, 2). These criteria were intended to improve the quality and completeness of reporting of RCTs in health care research. This paper discusses the relevance of the CONSORT recommendations for the reporting and design of eHealth research. Methods We reviewed the CONSORT recommendations and discussed their particular relevance to eHealth (electronic information, support and/or communication resources designed to promote health) research. This review focuses on such issues as recruitment and screening of participants, description of treatment elements, and reporting of outcome data and adverse events. Results eHealth research presents special challenges regarding the comprehensive and effective reporting of research information. However, the strategic application of CONSORT recommendations holds great promise for improving the quality and informativeness of eHealth research. Conclusion Investigators need to consider CONSORT recommendations at all stages of the research enterprise, including planning, execution and reporting in order to increase the informativeness of their research efforts. Practice Implications The recommendations contained in this paper have the potential to enhance the public health and scientific value of eHealth research.

Representativeness of Participants in Heart Failure E-Health Trials: A Report From the E-Vita HF Study

“…As a consequence, the results of the trial may not be generalizable to that domain of patients. (1) However, this will only be the case if the characteristics (e.g. age) in which the groups differ, modify the effect of the intervention (e.g.…”

Effects of a Tailored Positive Psychology Intervention on Well-Being and Pain in Individuals With Chronic Pain and a Physical Disability

“…A computer-based intervention was chosen because it is linked to better accessibility, sustainability, standardization, and lower costs of an intervention, and fosters anonymity and empowerment for participants. [50][51][52] A tailored intervention was used as it has been found to lead to a greater effectiveness of the intervention. 53 The specific aims of this study were to (1) evaluate the feasibility of study design and procedures, (2) assess the acceptability of the intervention, (3) determine the effects of the intervention on a number of well-being and pain-related outcomes, (4) determine the sample size to detect significant effects for the outcomes impacted by the intervention in a larger efficacy trial, (5) calculate the intervention dose, and (6) evaluate the utility of measurement instruments for assessing the effects of the intervention.…”

VisOHC: Designing Visual Analytics for Online Health Communities

“…Health-related Web sites, such as webmd.com, not only provide health information, but also enable patients to connect with others experiencing similar challenges. Such peer patient interaction generates the unique resources often missing in conventional clinical settings, fulfilling the informational and emotional needs of the patients [2, 5]. Accordingly, hospitals and health care practices increasingly adopt social media Web technologies as a means to deliver high-quality patient care [2].…”