2015
DOI: 10.4103/0975-5950.168224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Release of nickel and chromium ions in the saliva of patients with fixed orthodontic appliance: An in-vivo study

Abstract: Introduction:Various components of fixed orthodontic appliances are continuously interacting with saliva and other fluids in the mouth releasing various metal ions including nickel and chromium that can cause damaging effects if their concentration exceeds above the toxic dose.Aim:To determine and compare the level of nickel and chromium in the saliva of patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment at different time periods.Materials and Methods:The sample of saliva of 13 patients was taken at different tim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
25
1
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(59 reference statements)
5
25
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The main advantage of the in-vitro part of this study is that it can easily standardize all the variables which are difficult to control in-vivo. Meanwhile, the in-vivo part has many advantages as the artificial saliva undergoes precipitation over a period of time and is not allowed to flow through the system as intraoral and the release of any salivary ion is affected by many factors such as pH, quantity and temperature of saliva, microflora, chemical and physical properties of food and drink, and the general oral health condition, which could give a better and reliable result (60) . Therefore, this study had in-vitro and in vivo part to complement each other to obtain guaranteed results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main advantage of the in-vitro part of this study is that it can easily standardize all the variables which are difficult to control in-vivo. Meanwhile, the in-vivo part has many advantages as the artificial saliva undergoes precipitation over a period of time and is not allowed to flow through the system as intraoral and the release of any salivary ion is affected by many factors such as pH, quantity and temperature of saliva, microflora, chemical and physical properties of food and drink, and the general oral health condition, which could give a better and reliable result (60) . Therefore, this study had in-vitro and in vivo part to complement each other to obtain guaranteed results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because most of the studies reported that the salivary nickel and chromium levels peak at the first months post-treatment (4,23,36,38,52,60) , especially at the first one, and might tend to reduce later "back to baseline levels or lower". Thus, the 2 months were selected as a recall end interval in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, some in-vivo researches showed biologic toxicity in orthodontic patients. 12,13 Few clinical studies on the orthodontic metal ion release lack any clinical trials, thus and in view of the lack any assessments of orthodontic materials in-vitro or clinically, the purpose of the present study aimed to evaluate the salivary amount of Nickel, Chromium and Iron ions in orthodontic patients before treatment, one month and four months after the beginning of treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, Ni helps bone health and production of red blood cells. But, high dose of Ni can cause serious problems including acting as a mutating substance by causing alteration in DNA . Other complications include sarcoma, genotoxicity, and carcinogenicity .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, high dose of Ni can cause serious problems including acting as a mutating substance by causing alteration in DNA. 2 Other complications include sarcoma, genotoxicity, and carcinogenicity. 3,4 It has been reported that patients with a functioning and failed metal prosthesis show relatively high metal sensitivity of 25% and 60% respectively, compared to 10-17% in general population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%