2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2012.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Release of hazardous substances in flood events: Damage model for atmospheric storage tanks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be an interesting solution for the problem, but this database is still not very well known and thus, presents limited number of reported accidents. Another solution is the development of specific equipment damage models to flood, as it has been done by Landucci et al (2012Landucci et al ( , 2014 for atmospheric vertical vessels and for horizontal cylindrical vessels at atmospheric or at high pressures. These models may facilitate the assessment of flood Natech risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This could be an interesting solution for the problem, but this database is still not very well known and thus, presents limited number of reported accidents. Another solution is the development of specific equipment damage models to flood, as it has been done by Landucci et al (2012Landucci et al ( , 2014 for atmospheric vertical vessels and for horizontal cylindrical vessels at atmospheric or at high pressures. These models may facilitate the assessment of flood Natech risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, some interesting work was recently done in developing damage models for atmospheric vertical vessels (Landucci et al, 2012) and for horizontal cylindrical vessels at atmospheric or at high pressures (Landucci et al, 2014). The aim of Landucci et al (2014) is helping the implementation of Natech scenarios in conventional Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) studies, in particular the frequency assessment which needs to take into account both parameters related to the likelihood of the natural event and to the credibility of equipment failures.…”
Section: Analysis Of Existing Methodologies In Natech Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This was previously discussed by Landucci et al [24] and Cozzani et al [25], where the use of equipment vulnerability models was applied to the assessment of domino effect due to internal process causes (e.g., fires, explosions, and fragment projection). With respect to NaTech scenarios triggered by floods, recent studies allowed determining specific fragility models for both atmospheric and pressurized equipment, considering different types of geometries and flooding conditions [26][27][28]. Such models represent an important upgrade of the previous overconservative tools available to assess equipment fragility due to floods (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%