2016
DOI: 10.4236/wjcd.2016.68032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Release of Cardiac Biomarkers during a Cycling Race

Abstract: Objectives: Over the past two decades, a large interest in cardiac marker elevations has developed in endurance sports events. The intense effort is not without risk. We aimed to see if the relatively cardiospecific biomarkers could show the damage on cardiac muscle cells. Methods: Fourteen cyclists were recruited for an international race (177 km). We studied different cardiac biomarkers, renal function markers and blood cytology. The subjects were submitted to three blood test: one before (T0), one just afte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Brain NPs are hormones synthesized by cardiomyocytes (13). High blood concentrations reflect a high myocardial afterload tension due to the stretching of the myocytes, Gal-3 is a marker of cardiac fibrosis (18,19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brain NPs are hormones synthesized by cardiomyocytes (13). High blood concentrations reflect a high myocardial afterload tension due to the stretching of the myocytes, Gal-3 is a marker of cardiac fibrosis (18,19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, this biomarker increases when myocyte injury occurs. In addition, H-FABP can be a sign of ischaemia, as defined by the European Society of Cardiology and the American Heart Association ( 10 ). Previous studies have suggested that exercise-induced hsTnT increases can correspond to a benign reversible physiologic phenomenon, but the indications of this parameter are controversial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data were analysed for the total group and per exercise modality. A priori sample size calculation revealed a necessary n = 8 per group in order to detect a postexercise difference between modalities regarding a common cardiac biomarker (N‐terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide) using Student's unpaired t ‐test, two‐tailed, α = 0.05, 1 − β = 0.8, effect size = 1.52, in ultra‐trail runners (postexercise mean = 325 ng/L, SD = 220 ng/L; Le Goff, Kaux, et al., 2020 ) and cyclists (postexercise mean = 80.64 ng/L, SD = 60.00 ng/L; Le Goff et al., 2015 ). Repeated‐measures two‐way ANOVA (repeated effect: exercise; group effect: exercise modality) with Bonferroni post hoc comparisons was used for the analysis of cell and serum parameters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%