During the past year, progress in echocardiographic research has again been incremental with reports describing both expanded and refined applications of tissue Doppler imaging (TDI), myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE), stress echocardiography, and real-time 3-dimensional (RT3D) imaging. The primary focus this year has been on the use of TDI and speckle tracking (ST) to identify left ventricular (LV) systolic and/or diastolic dyssynchrony (DYS) and determine its prevalence and functional significance in specific patient subgroups (systolic heart failure [SHF], diastolic heart failure [DHF], a narrow QRS [N-QRS] interval, right ventricular [RV] pacing, and myocardial infarction). Additionally, the effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on atrial function, exerciseinduced mitral regurgitation (MR), and clinical and echocardiographic parameters of cardiac function in patients with both prolonged (P-QRS) and N-QRS intervals have been explored. In other areas, 2 excellent studies have examined: 1) the potential of contrast echocardiography using targeted microbubbles to detect remote ischemia based on 'ischemic memory'; and 2) the potential clinical toxicity of contrast echocardiography. Several large studies have examined the relationship of a negative stress echocardiogram and cardiovascular events during long-term followup, the association between patent foramen ovale (PFO) and stroke in a prospectively followed population, the relationship of aortic atheroma and long-term outcomes in a surgical population, and the significance of wall motion abnormalities in a population without evidence of cardiovascular disease. Studies in valvular heart disease have described the significance of low flow/low gradient severe aortic stenosis in patients with normal ejection fraction (EF), the shape of the proximal flow convergence region by RT3D echocardiography and its impact on the quantitation of MR, and the effects of ischemic MR on post-infarct remodeling. As always, it is impossible to review all of the studies published in the past year, and as a result this review attempts to focus on new observations, areas of particular focus, and confirmation of small group data in larger populations.
LV DYSIn patients with DHF. A number of studies have validated the role of (TDI and ST in assessing mechanical systolic DYS in patients with congestive heart failure, prolonged QRS intervals and poor systolic LV function. Less is known about the presence of systolic and diastolic DYS in patients with DHF. Wang et al. (1) compared the prevalence and significance of systolic and diastolic DYS in patients with SHF (n ϭ 60), DHF (n ϭ 60), and control subjects (n ϭ 35). Systolic DYS was based on the maximal time difference between the shortest and longest interval from the onset of the QRS complex to both onset and peak of TDI systolic velocity for the 4 basal LV segments. Diastolic DYS was measured from the QRS to the onset of the early diastolic velocity in the same segments. In the DHF group, there were 20 patients (33%)...