2016 IEEE Sensor Array and Multichannel Signal Processing Workshop (SAM) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/sam.2016.7569613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relaying with finite blocklength: Challenge vs. opportunity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this scenario, S sends the message to D and R in the broadcasting phase by employing n S channel uses. Afterwards, if R decodes the data packet accurately, the message transfers to D in the relaying phase through n R channel uses [2], [17]. In the broadcasting phase, the received signals at D and R are y 1 " h 1 x `w1 and y 2 " h 2 x `w2 respectively.…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this scenario, S sends the message to D and R in the broadcasting phase by employing n S channel uses. Afterwards, if R decodes the data packet accurately, the message transfers to D in the relaying phase through n R channel uses [2], [17]. In the broadcasting phase, the received signals at D and R are y 1 " h 1 x `w1 and y 2 " h 2 x `w2 respectively.…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the broadcasting phase, the received signals at D and R are y 1 " h 1 x`w 1 and y 2 " h 2 x`w 2 respectively. If R successfully collaborates with S, the received signal at D is y 3 " h 3 x`w 3 , where the transmitted signal is x and the AWGN noise vector with power N 0 " 1 is denoted by w i , where i P tX, Y, Zu [2], [17]. In a DF-based relaying protocol, the instantaneous SNR depends on the total power constraint P " P S`PR " ηP`p1´ηqP , which is given by Z " ηP |h 1 | 2 {N 0 , X " ηP |h 2 | 2 {N 0 and Y " p1´ηqP |h 3 | 2 {N 0 for the direct link, broadcasting link and relaying link respectively, where 0 ă η ď 1 is the power allocation factor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They indicate that the performance loss increases if the outage probability of the source-to-relay link is higher than the overall outage probability. The efficiency of multi-relay DF scenario under the assumption of perfect channel-state-information (CSI) and partial CSI is provided in [28]. Authors show that with perfect CSI, the throughput of IFB is smaller than the throughput with FB coding.…”
Section: On the Impact Of Cooperative Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors in [16] propose cooperative relaying as a way to meet the high reliability and latency requirements. In [17], authors examine the performance of a multi-relay DF protocol with FB under the perfect CSI and partial CSI. They indicate that with perfect CSI, the throughput of FB coding is higher than the throughput of IFB coding.…”
Section: B Cooperative Relaying With Finite Blocklengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this scenario, first S sends data to D and R which is known as broadcasting phase. Thereafter, in the relaying phase, R forwards to D only if it decoded the message correctly [15], [17]. The received signals are written as y 1 " h 1 x `w1 and y 2 " h 2 x `w2 at D and R respectively, and if R participates, the received signal at D is y 3 " h 3 x `w3 , where x is the transmitted signal with power P and w i is the AWGN noise vector with power N 0 " 1 where i P tX, Y, Zu.…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%