2014
DOI: 10.1109/twc.2014.2322607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relay Selection for Two-Way Full Duplex Relay Networks With Amplify-and-Forward Protocol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
96
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 200 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
96
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The residual self-interference, after self-cancellation, is typically modeled as a zero-mean Gaussian random variable [33], [34]. The residual self-interference at node i is e i = √ P ihi,i x i , whereh i,i is the residual interference channel coefficient after self-cancellation at node i, and…”
Section: A Full-duplex and Self-interference Cancellationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The residual self-interference, after self-cancellation, is typically modeled as a zero-mean Gaussian random variable [33], [34]. The residual self-interference at node i is e i = √ P ihi,i x i , whereh i,i is the residual interference channel coefficient after self-cancellation at node i, and…”
Section: A Full-duplex and Self-interference Cancellationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider a FD-TWRC-SM with DF relaying protocol at the relay node that is similar to the TWRC with the FD relaying in [38]. As shown in Fig.…”
Section: System Model Of Fd-twrc-smmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(10)- (17) and following the steps of proving Proposition 2, we have the following asymptotic ABEP of FD-TWRC-SM with unequal average SNRs at the nodes. ABEP 1r,FD,PA and ABEP r2,FD,PA are respectively computed by (37) and (38), where…”
Section: +Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations