2016 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference 2016
DOI: 10.1109/wcnc.2016.7564745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relay selection for energy harvesting relay networks using a repeated game

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the authors proposed a stable game cost factor that offers tradeoff between network performance and complexity. In [7], a multi-relay selection scheme for energy-harvesting cooperative networks with a single source-destination pair is studied via a repeated Stackelberg game with only statistical knowledge of channel gains and energy profiles. Particularly, AF relays are selected based on repeated interactions with the source, which updates its payment offers to sequentially induce utility-maximizing relays to participate in the transmission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, the authors proposed a stable game cost factor that offers tradeoff between network performance and complexity. In [7], a multi-relay selection scheme for energy-harvesting cooperative networks with a single source-destination pair is studied via a repeated Stackelberg game with only statistical knowledge of channel gains and energy profiles. Particularly, AF relays are selected based on repeated interactions with the source, which updates its payment offers to sequentially induce utility-maximizing relays to participate in the transmission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noteworthy the learning process of each relay state θ r k is independent of the other relays, which significantly decreases computational costs 7. The more accurate the belief is, the better the relay selections of each source node are (i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…proposed in [22] a noncooperative bargaining game to optimize the goodput of OFDM-based relaying networks with energy harvesting. Repeated non-cooperative Bayesian Stackelberg game has been employed in [23] for relay selection in EH relay networks. Stackelberg game is also used in [24] to manage the exchange of transmitted data and harvested energy in two-hop wireless networks where the base stations are able to wirelessly power the relays.…”
Section: A State-of-the-art Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approaches based on mere mathematical optimization and a-priori fixed relaying protocols like those of [15], [16] [17], [18], and [19] may lack of flexibility in addressing the QoS fluctuations due to unstable power supply and/or may be computationally expensive. Noncooperative game solutions of [22], [23] [24], [25], and [26], considering bargaining games or Stackelberg games, are inspired to centralized and strictly normative concepts aimed at disciplining the selfish behavior of agents. Such an approach does not seem the best way to model the distributed cooperation typical of MIMO-based relaying with energy harvesting, where agents should harmonize their behavior in order to exploit at their best the radio resources and the limited energy reserves.…”
Section: B Contribution Of the Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, a number of researchers have investigated the problems of resource allocation and relay selection for battery powered networks [17] and EH networks [18] at the physical layer. Cooperation at the MAC layer was also shown to provide higher transmission rates and lower delays particularly in fading channels [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%