1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-8853(96)00423-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relaxation of thermo-remanent magnetization in different magnetic phases of Fe-rich γ-FeNiCr alloys

Abstract: The time decay of the thermoremanent magnetization(TRM) of the Fe 80−x Ni x Cr 20 (14 ≤ x ≤ 30) alloys has been measured for four different magnetic phases within the fcc γ-phase using a SQUID magnetometer. In the spin-glass phase(SG)(X=19) very distinct ageing effects are observed where M(t) can be described as M (t) = M 0 (t/t w ) −γ exp[−(t/τ ) 1−n ] for the entire time domain. In the reentrant spin-glass(RSG)(X= 23 and 26), M(t) can be better represented by the stretched exponential with an addition of a c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(72 reference statements)
3
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As seen from figure 5 the M (t) decays very slowly with time and remains nonzero even after 62000 s. A semilogarithmic plot of M (t) data is shown in the inset of figure 5 which clearly shows that M (t) data do not follow the logarithmic decay, M (t) = M 0 − S log(t). However, the M (t) data could be well fitted by a superposition of a stretched exponential and a constant term, [29,30] …”
Section: Magnetic Susceptibility and Magnetizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As seen from figure 5 the M (t) decays very slowly with time and remains nonzero even after 62000 s. A semilogarithmic plot of M (t) data is shown in the inset of figure 5 which clearly shows that M (t) data do not follow the logarithmic decay, M (t) = M 0 − S log(t). However, the M (t) data could be well fitted by a superposition of a stretched exponential and a constant term, [29,30] …”
Section: Magnetic Susceptibility and Magnetizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very similar conclusions were reached in an antiferromagnetic FeNiCr alloy. 5 It should be noted here that all the three alloys in the present investigation have long-range-antiferromagnetic order. However, in an earlier work Ikeda and Kikuta 13 could not find any relaxation of TRM over a period of 10 h in the antiferromagnet Mn 0.45 Zn 0.55 F 2 for TϽT N .…”
Section: ͑5͒mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Thermoremanent magnetization ͑TRM͒ in different magnetic phases has been recently summarized and studied in ␥ϪFe 80Ϫx Ni x Cr 20 (14рxр30) alloys showing antiferromagnetic, spin-glass, re-entrant spin-glass, and ferromagnetic phases as x is varied. 5 Several theoretical models have been discussed for the time dependence of magnetization ͑see Ref. 5 and references therein͒.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) Power law relaxation M(t) = M 0 t −ζ , ζ < 1. This type of relaxation has been observed in spin glasses such as the γ -FeNiCr alloys [21] and in single-domain ferromagnetic nanoparticles [22]. This behavior can be understood in the context of the flipping of spin clusters [23].…”
Section: B Competition Between Domain Nucleation and Domain-wall Promentioning
confidence: 68%