2002
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.65.115109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relaxation of an electron system: Conserving approximation

Abstract: The dynamic response of an interacting electron system is determined by an extension of the relaxation-time approximation forced to obey local conservation laws for number, momentum and energy. A consequence of these imposed constraints is that the local electron equilibrium distribution must have a space-and time-dependent chemical potential, drift velocity and temperature. Both quantum kinetic and semi-classical arguments are given, and we calculate and analyze the corresponding analytical d-dimensional diel… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The selfconsistent choice of diagrams is dictated by the requirement of gauge invariance or, equivalently, by the application of Ward-Pitaevskii identities, 10 thereby ensuring that conservation laws are enforced in the electron dynamics. 11 As previously noted, 8,12,13 the polarizability diagrams in Fig. 1 can all be expressed in terms of the three-point function ⌳ (3) (q ,p ); thus An explicit formula for the three-point function ⌳ (3) (p ,q ) in two dimensions has been given by Neumayr and Metzner.…”
Section: ͑7͒mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The selfconsistent choice of diagrams is dictated by the requirement of gauge invariance or, equivalently, by the application of Ward-Pitaevskii identities, 10 thereby ensuring that conservation laws are enforced in the electron dynamics. 11 As previously noted, 8,12,13 the polarizability diagrams in Fig. 1 can all be expressed in terms of the three-point function ⌳ (3) (q ,p ); thus An explicit formula for the three-point function ⌳ (3) (p ,q ) in two dimensions has been given by Neumayr and Metzner.…”
Section: ͑7͒mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Furthermore, more advanced number-and energy-conserving BGK as well as number-, momentum-, energy-conserving BGK models have been presented in Refs. [25,26] and [27,28], respectively, which yield analytic expressions for the permittivities in terms of combinations of the plasma dispersion function. However, for a completely ionized plasma, the model permittivity within the BGK approximation and the corresponding Drude model for the transverse permittivity [7,[22][23][24] lead to the significant deviations from the known limiting cases in the range of moderate and strong collisions [29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We know that changes in entropy satisfy δS = δQ/T + δS i , where δQ is the generalized heat added to the system, such as heat flowing in through the system boundaries and δS i is the entropy change due to irreversible processes such as relaxation. For a closed system, δQ = 0 and δS = δS i ≥ 0 [5,[25][26][27][28]. As the system is dynamically driven by applied fields, the material relaxes and local fields are formed in the material that differ from the applied fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%