2019
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz397
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

relax: the analysis of biomolecular kinetics and thermodynamics using NMR relaxation dispersion data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fits of a two-state exchange model as reported by Meiboom 55 , to the BMCRD data were obtained from the program relax, version 4.0. 56 For the fits shown in Figure 1 we chose five residues for which data of both crystals were available: I23 (only 950 MHz, as no 600 MHz data were available for cubic-PEG-ub) and V26, K27, T55, D58 (600 and 950 MHz). We have investigated how the choice of residues, and the choice of static magnetic field strengths influences the outcome of these fits; we find that using different subgroups of residues in the β-turn region, or including other residues in the fits where available (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fits of a two-state exchange model as reported by Meiboom 55 , to the BMCRD data were obtained from the program relax, version 4.0. 56 For the fits shown in Figure 1 we chose five residues for which data of both crystals were available: I23 (only 950 MHz, as no 600 MHz data were available for cubic-PEG-ub) and V26, K27, T55, D58 (600 and 950 MHz). We have investigated how the choice of residues, and the choice of static magnetic field strengths influences the outcome of these fits; we find that using different subgroups of residues in the β-turn region, or including other residues in the fits where available (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 15 N-CPMG relaxation dispersion experiments with NCp7 samples at different concentrations (400 and 100 μM) were recorded at 950 MHz and 35 °C using 11 points with different ν CPMG values. Τhe errors were evaluated using the formula , ( (accessed on 14 February 2022), relax Manual [ 40 ]) where uncertainties on peak intensities, and , were estimated using two repeated points in the CPMG experiments; I 1 (ω1) and I 0 are the peak intensities at a frequency ω 1 in the CPMG series, and I 0 is the experiment performed without the constant time [ 30 ]. Only for the experiments with dilute samples, were the quantity of D2O in samples reduced to 4%, to decrease deuterium isotopic effects that affect the exchange rates [ 41 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The R 2,eff was calculated as R 2,eff (ν CPMG ) = (−1/ T ) ln [ I ( ν CPMG )/ I 0 ], where I ( ν CPMG ) and I 0 are the intensities of peaks recorded with and without the CPMG intervals. The 15 N relaxation dispersion profiles for individual residues at both 600 and 850 MHz were fitted to a two‐site exchange model (A↔B), the Carver and Richards equation (CR72), by using the software relax . Successful fit to the CR72 model yields the population‐average transverse relaxation rate ( R 20 ), exchange rate ( k ex ), population of the major state ( p A ), and absolute values of 15 N chemical shift difference between two states (Δ ω N ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%