IEEE INFOCOM 2014 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications 2014
DOI: 10.1109/infocom.2014.6848019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relax, but Do Not Sleep: A new perspective on Green Wireless Networking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus the power consumption of the BS and relay i can be expressed as P B = p B +∆p B and P i = p i +∆p i , respectively. Since the BS dominates the energy consumption in cellular networks [36], its required energy can be taken not only from the renewable energy generator but also from the power grid. Due to the investment cost each RS is only powered by grid.…”
Section: Energy Management Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus the power consumption of the BS and relay i can be expressed as P B = p B +∆p B and P i = p i +∆p i , respectively. Since the BS dominates the energy consumption in cellular networks [36], its required energy can be taken not only from the renewable energy generator but also from the power grid. Due to the investment cost each RS is only powered by grid.…”
Section: Energy Management Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Year CSO type / architecture Realistic Coverage aspects Complexity and ICI model feasibility analysis [9] 2016 Snapshot / Semi-distributed Full-load Downlink [10] 2016 Traffic profiling / Centralized Full-load Downlink Partially [11] 2016 Traffic profiling / Semi-distributed Load-coupling Downlink Partially [12] 2015 Snapshot / Centralized Full-load Downlink Partially [13] 2015 Snapshot / Centralized Full-load Downlink Partially [14] 2014 Snapshot / Centralized Constant Downlink × [15] 2014 Traffic profiling / Semi-distributed Full-load Downlink [16] 2014 Snapshot / Centralized Constant Downlink × [17] 2013 Snapshot / Centralized Full-load Downlink × [18] 2013 Traffic profiling / Centralized Load-coupling Downlink × [19] 2013 Snapshot / Centralized Constant × Partially [20] 2013 Snapshot / Centralized Full-load Downlink Partially [21] 2013 Snapshot / Centralized Full-load Downlink × [22] 2012 Snapshot / Centralized Constant × × [23] 2012 Snapshot / Centralized Full-load Downlink × [24] 2011 Traffic profiling / Semi-distributed Full-load Downlink Partially [25] 2010 Snapshot / Centralized Full-load Downlink × [26] 2010 Snapshot / Centralized Constant Downlink × [27] 2010 Traffic profiling / Semi-distributed Full-load × × [28] 2009 Snapshot / Both Full-load × × type of solution provides the ultimate performance in terms of energy savings. However, feasibility becomes a serious issue as it will be shown later on.…”
Section: Refmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, in the comparative perspective shown in Table I, the following criteria have been considered: • CSO type / architecture: CSO solutions can be classified as 'snapshot' or 'traffic profiling' CSO depending on the approach followed to take the on/off decisions. In snapshot CSO (e.g., [14,16,17,19]), decisions involve the analysis of discrete realizations of users, i.e., whenever a CSO decision is required, information of every single user in the network needs to be available at a central unit where an heuristic or optimization procedure is performed. Given its nature, this…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the support of the server, the eNodeB needs to exchange the control message with neighbors since RRC management remains in each eNodeB. Another method in Figure 3(c) that uses relay stations and reduces the power instead of putting the eNodeB in sleep mode, named Relax is presented in [18]. In this method, they use the information of each user such as the distance from a certain eNodeB to the users and energy consumption between a certain eNodeB and users.…”
Section: Description Of Previous Studies: a Distributed Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relax shows the most rapid increase because the number of users is considered in order to optimize the placement of the relay station. Here, relay stations are considered as eNodeBs, and the total number of users followed the example in [18] since we do not consider the number of users in analysis. Siesta shows the lowest number of message exchanges since the control messages are not exchanged between eNodeBs as described in Figure 4(a).…”
Section: Description Of Previous Studies: a Distributed Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%