The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory 2001
DOI: 10.1002/9780470756416.ch4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relativized Minimality Effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
320
0
14

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 336 publications
(339 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
320
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…8, p. 1) Extraction of the subject in French, see example (4b), leads to a special form of the complementizer, namely qui, whereas extraction of the object goes together with the regular complementizer que. Some scholars have argued that the special form of the complementizer in these subject extraction cases is a form of CA (e.g., Kayne 1975;Pesetsky 1982;Rizzi 1990), but several other analyses for this phenomenon that do not involve CA can also be found in the literature (see for instance Rooryck 2000 or Koopman andSportiche 2014). This chapter does not go into CA with subject extraction, but see Complementizer Deletion for an exhaustive discussion of these and similar data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8, p. 1) Extraction of the subject in French, see example (4b), leads to a special form of the complementizer, namely qui, whereas extraction of the object goes together with the regular complementizer que. Some scholars have argued that the special form of the complementizer in these subject extraction cases is a form of CA (e.g., Kayne 1975;Pesetsky 1982;Rizzi 1990), but several other analyses for this phenomenon that do not involve CA can also be found in the literature (see for instance Rooryck 2000 or Koopman andSportiche 2014). This chapter does not go into CA with subject extraction, but see Complementizer Deletion for an exhaustive discussion of these and similar data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the RM principle, the relation between X and Y cannot hold if Z is a potential candidate for the local relation (Rizzi (1990), (2004)). As in Friedmann, Belletti, Rizzi (2009), let us refer to X as the target/attractor; to Z as the intervener; to Y as the origin.…”
Section: A Detour On Comprehension: a Relativized Minimality Account mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How plausible is this? Starke (2001) argues that the central idea of relativized minimality (Rizzi 1990(Rizzi , 2001) and related concepts of locality boils down to order preservation (hierarchically construed) within classes of elements. From that perspective, the movements in (34b-e) are well behaved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%