2018
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.98.012137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relativistic vortex electrons: Paraxial versus nonparaxial regimes

Abstract: A plane-wave approximation in particle physics implies that a width of a massive wave packet σ ⊥ is much larger than its Compton wavelength λc = /mc. For Gaussian packets or for those with the non-singular phases (say, the Airy beams), corrections to this approximation are attenuated as λ 2 c /σ 2 ⊥ ≪ 1 and usually negligible. Here we show that this situation drastically changes for particles with the phase vortices associated with an orbital angular momentum ℓ . For highly twisted beams with |ℓ| ≫ 1, the non-… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
55
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The non-paraxial phenomena can be enhanced for highly twisted electrons with |ℓ| ≫ 1 [8], and it turns out that, somewhat contrary to intuition, the spreading may further enhance some of them. The direct detection of the above azimuthal asymmetry is feasible with the already available electron beams, which would be the first observation of a non-paraxial effect with the vortex elec-trons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The non-paraxial phenomena can be enhanced for highly twisted electrons with |ℓ| ≫ 1 [8], and it turns out that, somewhat contrary to intuition, the spreading may further enhance some of them. The direct detection of the above azimuthal asymmetry is feasible with the already available electron beams, which would be the first observation of a non-paraxial effect with the vortex elec-trons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…[8], these beams can actually be used only for relativistic electrons but hardly for those with ε c ∼ 300 keV. The generalized Laguerre-Gaussian beams, proposed in [8], can be used beyond the paraxial regime and, in particular, stay valid in the rest frame. They represent an exact solution to the Dirac equation in relativistic case and to the Schrödinger equation for non-relativistic energies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expression (79) has the form (39) and tends to zero at infinity as an exponent (for the wave packets with such an asymptote, see, e.g., [74,75]). When λ → 0, the exponential profile considered above is reproduced.…”
Section: Explicit Expressionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These packets represent a superposition of the Bessel beams with a Gaussian envelope. Although the Bessel beam is just a special case of the generalized Laguerre-Gaussian state [35], the model of Ref. [9] may predict larger corrections to the plane-wave cross sections, which is yet to be explored in detail.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where p ⊥ ∼ (0.1 − 100) |ℓ| keV for the twisted leptons and hadrons. In contrast to the previous calculations of the single-twisted scattering with the Bessel beams, here we imploy a generalized Laguerre-Gaussian state ψ ℓ,n=0 [35], which is a more general model of the relativistic vortex packet. While for the Bessel beam the cross section is generally insensitive to the OAM in the single-twisted scenario, this is not the case for the Laguerre-Gaussian packet, whose mean transverse momentum grows as |ℓ|.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%