1981
DOI: 10.1088/0305-4616/7/5/003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relativistic response of a Fermi gas

Abstract: Abstract. The relativistic response of an assembly of non-interacting nucleons is calculated and compared with the non-relativistic limit.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
56
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
56
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4.1 was obtained with the πN background being artificially reduced by a factor of three (compensated by larger ∆(1232) and N (1520) contributions to still reproduce the nucleon data) which seems to improve the fit. Note here that a simple averaging over Fermi motion seems to give a sufficient smearing of the N (1520) resonance, in contrast to previous findings in the literature [172,173,163,102] where a strong in-medium resonance broadening was required.…”
Section: Photoabsorption Spectracontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…4.1 was obtained with the πN background being artificially reduced by a factor of three (compensated by larger ∆(1232) and N (1520) contributions to still reproduce the nucleon data) which seems to improve the fit. Note here that a simple averaging over Fermi motion seems to give a sufficient smearing of the N (1520) resonance, in contrast to previous findings in the literature [172,173,163,102] where a strong in-medium resonance broadening was required.…”
Section: Photoabsorption Spectracontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…in a good agreement with data (discrepancies of the order of 10-15% for the muon capture rate), despite that those measurements involve extremely low nuclear excitation energies (smaller than 15-20 [25][26][27][28][29][30] MeV in the first [second] case), where the LFG picture of the nucleus might break down. However, it turns out that the present model provides one of the best existing combined description of these two low energy measurements, what increases our confidence on the QE predictions of the model at the higher transferred energies of interest for future neutrino experiments.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…In the present work we have computed the non-mesonic component of the decay-using the same relativistic RPA model that was used to confirm the LAMPF measurements. The dynamical quenching of the πNN coupling constant in the medium was now responsible for generating decay widths for Λ-hypernuclei that were two to three times smaller than those obtained by existing nonrelativistic calculations [9,23]-and considerably smaller than measured experimentally [15]. This suggests that other modes of excitation, besides pion-like modes, might be important in understanding the decay width of Λ-hypernuclei [5,6,11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This large reduction factor is not exclusive to 40 Ca, but is seen in all hypernuclei reported in Table II. It is also relevant to mention that in a very recent publication (of only a few days old!) a new nonrelativistic evaluation of the Λ-decay width has been made [23]. For the case of 40 Ca a total decay width (without including the two-particle-two-hole component of the decay) of Γ/Γ 0 = 1.08 has been reported.…”
Section: B Non-mesonic Decaymentioning
confidence: 99%