Nstar 2001 2001
DOI: 10.1142/9789812810878_0017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relativistic Quark Models

Abstract: The application of relativistic constituent quark models to the evaluation of the electromagnetic properties of the nucleon and its resonances is addressed. The role of the pair creation process in the Feynmann triangle diagram is discussed and the importance both of choosing the light-front formalism and of using a Breit frame where the plus component of the four-momentum transfer is vanishing, is stressed. The nucleon elastic form factors are calculated free of spurious effects related to the loss of rotatio… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the latter case the stronger fall-off produced by the PFSM is a welcome feature which brings the theoretical predictions from constituent quark models close to experiments [29]. For the usual front-form spectator current in the q + = 0 frame agreement with experiment is achieved only by introducing electromagnetic form factors for the constituent quarks [31].…”
Section: B Comparison With the Point-form Spectator Modelmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the latter case the stronger fall-off produced by the PFSM is a welcome feature which brings the theoretical predictions from constituent quark models close to experiments [29]. For the usual front-form spectator current in the q + = 0 frame agreement with experiment is achieved only by introducing electromagnetic form factors for the constituent quarks [31].…”
Section: B Comparison With the Point-form Spectator Modelmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The spin-rotation factor S is the | k M | → ∞ limit of the trace of the Wigner D function occurring in Eq. (31). In order to find explicit expressions for kq , m q q and S in terms of the integration variable k′ q and the momentum transfer Q we have to specify our kinematics.…”
Section: Identifying the Meson Form Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The point-form spectator approximation (PFSA) using pointlike constituent quarks and a Goldstone boson exchange interaction fitted to spectroscopic data (dash-dot) lies well above the g p and well below the GEH data for large Q 2 [27]. Finally, a light-front calculation using one-gluon exchange and constituent-quark form factors fitted to Q 2 < 1 (GeV/c) 2 provides a good fit (solid) up to about 4 (GeV/c) 2 [28]. However, none of the available theoretical calculations provides a truly quantitative description for all four form factors over a wide range of Q 2 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…shows the theoretical predictions of the ratio of the form factors for selected models. In this figure, "VMD+pQCD" denotes the extended Gari-Krümpelmann model by Lomon[Lom01,Lom02]; "Chiral Soliton" denotes the chiral soliton model by Holzwarth[Hol96,Hol02] (results for model B2 are plotted); "OGE CQM" denotes the CQM on the light-front with one-gluon exchange interaction by Cardarelli and Simula[Car00] and Simula[Sim01]; "LFCBM" denotes light-front cloudy bag model by Miller[Mil02]; and "GBE CQM" denotes the CQM with Goldstone boson exchange interaction by Wagenbrunn et al[Wag01] and Boffi et al[Bof02]. The top panel inFigure 2…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%