2004
DOI: 10.1109/tps.2004.828898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relativistic Magnetron Driven by a Microsecond E-Beam Accelerator With a Ceramic Insulator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The advantages of the RPM include: 1) larger cathode area yields much higher available electron current at a given current density; 2) larger anode area for improved heat dissipation; 3) decoupling of the design of the anode-cathode (AK) gap from the vane geometry; 4) scalability to higher powers by increasing the number of cavities (shown in simulations [8]); 5) decreased volume of magnetic field (scales as N) compared with that in conventional cylindrical magnetrons (scales as N 2 ), where N is the number of cavities. Computer simulations and experiments at the UM have demonstrated that this unoptimized RPM device can operate as a relativistic magnetron with similar efficiencies as conventional cylindrical relativistic magnetrons [9]- [13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantages of the RPM include: 1) larger cathode area yields much higher available electron current at a given current density; 2) larger anode area for improved heat dissipation; 3) decoupling of the design of the anode-cathode (AK) gap from the vane geometry; 4) scalability to higher powers by increasing the number of cavities (shown in simulations [8]); 5) decreased volume of magnetic field (scales as N) compared with that in conventional cylindrical magnetrons (scales as N 2 ), where N is the number of cavities. Computer simulations and experiments at the UM have demonstrated that this unoptimized RPM device can operate as a relativistic magnetron with similar efficiencies as conventional cylindrical relativistic magnetrons [9]- [13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is done to increase the bandwidth of the waveguide to allow for reduced waveguide widths which, in turn, allow for reduced phase velocities for the RF wave in the cavity. For reference, if a non-ridged waveguide were used and operated just above cutoff, the wave phase velocity would be just above c/2, which leads to a reduced maximum theoretical efficiency, when compared with standard relativistic magnetrons that typically have phase velocities ranging from 0.24c to 0.34c [4], [5]. For the present simulations, each waveguide has a width of 4.8 cm, a height of 2.5 cm and ridge radii of 1.0cm, resulting in a cutoff frequency below 2 GHz.…”
Section: Rpm Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AFRL simulations and later UM experiments verified that the pi-mode was favored by the three-fold symmetry of a three-waveguide extraction system, which was utilized for most experiments. [7] Two of the three-extraction waveguides are terminated in UM-built water loads and power is monitored by calibrated (-60 dB) coupling loops in one arm. The third (priming) waveguide is attached through a UM-built TR switch and ferrite isolator to the AFRL priming magnetron output.…”
Section: Melba Accelerator and Magnetronmentioning
confidence: 99%