1971
DOI: 10.1016/s0092-640x(71)80002-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relativistic Hartree-Fock-Slater eigenvalues, radial expectation values, and potentials for atoms, 2 ≤ Z ≤ 126

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

5
56
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 292 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The atom is described by a Hartree-Fock-Slater potential, the nucleus is expected to bear the Fermi charge distribution. In this work, we use the potential of Lu et al [5].Usually, the kinetic energy of the converted electron is derived from experimental binding energy of that electron prior to conversion. Due to the absence of the experimental data, we use the eigenvalues from [5] instead.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The atom is described by a Hartree-Fock-Slater potential, the nucleus is expected to bear the Fermi charge distribution. In this work, we use the potential of Lu et al [5].Usually, the kinetic energy of the converted electron is derived from experimental binding energy of that electron prior to conversion. Due to the absence of the experimental data, we use the eigenvalues from [5] instead.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The atom is described by a Hartree-Fock-Slater potential, the nucleus is expected to bear the Fermi charge distribution. In this work, we use the potential of Lu et al [5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the exception of the nucleus description, this model is identical with that utilized by Rösel et al [2] (they used a homogenously charged sphere). The electron wavefunctions -both for the bound and free electrons -were calculated as solutions of the Dirac equation with the atomic potential of Lu et al [7] using the formulae of Bühring [8]. The conversion matrix elements were then evaluated by direct integration with reasonably small step.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the electron binding energies are not known for the SH atoms, we used the eigenvalues from [7]. There are two reasons for it.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%