1980
DOI: 10.1071/ph800261a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relativistic Effects in Electron Scattering by Atoms. I. Elastic Scattering by Mercury

Abstract: Elastic scattering of electrons in the energy range 0-25 eV by mercury atoms is investigated by applying a perturbation method to the (nonrelativistic) Schrodinger equation. Relativistic correction to the potential is treated using two models: a Pauli approximation and a second-order Dirac potential. The nonrelativistic Hartree-Fock wavefunction is used to describe the target in the zeroth order approximation. Electron exchange is found to be important in the collision. The relativistic correction due to mass … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
17
0

Year Published

1983
1983
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(61 reference statements)
5
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First of all it should be noted that while for krypton present relativistic and non-relativistic results almost coincide and both indicate the Ramsauer-Τownsend minimum, for xenon both sets of results differ remarkably at energies below 4 eV and only the non-relativistic data exhibit the minimum. As regards comparison with other theoretical data, an overall agreement between present relativistic results and those of Sin Fai Lam [16] should be stressed. That author used in his scattering calculations the Dirac-Hartree-Fock static potentials together with the scaled dipole polarization potentials obtained in the relativistic Po p l e -S c h o f i e l d (PS) method [25].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…First of all it should be noted that while for krypton present relativistic and non-relativistic results almost coincide and both indicate the Ramsauer-Τownsend minimum, for xenon both sets of results differ remarkably at energies below 4 eV and only the non-relativistic data exhibit the minimum. As regards comparison with other theoretical data, an overall agreement between present relativistic results and those of Sin Fai Lam [16] should be stressed. That author used in his scattering calculations the Dirac-Hartree-Fock static potentials together with the scaled dipole polarization potentials obtained in the relativistic Po p l e -S c h o f i e l d (PS) method [25].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Comparison with available experimental results slows the serious disagreement both for the total elastic and the differential elastic cross-sections. On the theoretical side, our data agree almost excellently with the results obtained by Sin Fai Lam [16] in the relativistic Pople-Schofield approximation but differ seriously from the non-relativistic polarized orbital results of McEachran et al [15]. We argue that although results of the latter group are in the better agreement with experiment, they were obtained in a methodologically questionable way.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 3 more Smart Citations