Abstract.After a short review of the recent developments in studies of neutrino-nucleus interactions, the predictions for double-differential and integrated charged current-induced quasielastic cross sections are presented within two different relativistic approaches: one is the so-called SuSA method, based on the superscaling behavior exhibited by electron scattering data; the other is a microscopic model based on relativistic mean field theory, and incorporating final-state interactions. The role played by the meson-exchange currents in the two-particle two-hole sector is explored and the results are compared with the recent MiniBooNE data.
IntroductionThe analysis and interpretation of ongoing and future neutrino oscillation experiments strongly rely on the nuclear modeling for describing the interaction of neutrinos and anti-neutrinos with the detector. Moreover, neutrino-nucleus scattering has recently become a matter of debate in connection with the possibility of extracting information on the nucleon axial mass. Specifically, the data on muon neutrino charged-current quasielastic (CCQE) cross sections obtained by the MiniBooNE collaboration [1] are substantially underestimated by the Relativistic Fermi Gas (RFG) prediction. This has been ascribed either to effects in the elementary neutrino-nucleon interaction, or to nuclear effects. The most poorly known ingredient of the single nucleon cross section is the cutoff parameter M A employed in the dipole prescription for the axial form factor of the nucleon, which can be extracted from ν and ν scattering off hydrogen and deuterium and from charged pion electroproduction. If M A is kept as a free parameter in the RFG calculation, a best fit of the MiniBooNE data yields a value of the order of 1.35 GeV/c 2 , much larger than the average value M A ≃ 1.026 ± 0.021 GeV/c 2 extracted from the (anti)neutrino world data [2]. This should be taken more as an indication of incompleteness of the theoretical description of the data based upon the RFG, rather than as a true indication for a larger axial mass. Indeed it is well-known from comparisons with electron scattering data that the RFG model is too crude to account for the nuclear dynamics. Hence it is crucial to explore more sophisticated nuclear models before drawing conclusions on the value of M A .Several calculations have been recently performed and applied to neutrino reactions. These include, besides the approach that will be presented here, models based on nuclear spectral functions [3,4,5,6,7,8,9, 10], relativistic independent particle models [11,12,13], relativistic Green function approaches [14,15,16,17,18], models including NN correlations [19,20,21],