Calculation of NMR and EPR Parameters 2004
DOI: 10.1002/3527601678.ch15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relativistic Calculations of Spin–Spin Coupling Constants of Heavy Nuclei

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
28
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(120 reference statements)
2
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For explicit expressions of the perturbation operators in various approximate two-component theories see Refs. [13,14,16,[70][71][72][73] for details. Likewise, Eqn (1) contains an operator related to the presence of the nuclear spin magnetic moment vector of nucleus A, component v, which may be written asĤ…”
Section: S48mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For explicit expressions of the perturbation operators in various approximate two-component theories see Refs. [13,14,16,[70][71][72][73] for details. Likewise, Eqn (1) contains an operator related to the presence of the nuclear spin magnetic moment vector of nucleus A, component v, which may be written asĤ…”
Section: S48mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding theoretical methods for relativistic NMR computations, we refer the reader to Refs. [13,14] and [16] for overviews.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this coupling is the smallest from the whole set and not very relevant to the analysis based on ratios. Other near-outliers are 2 J(H-Hg) couplings in CH 2 (HgCl) 2 and CH(HgCl) 3 , having J appr. /J exact ratios 1.41 and 1.57, respectively.…”
Section: Accuracy Of the New Approach Compared To The Reference Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since we also implemented an approach without involving the fit of the electron densities, we can address this issue by comparing the results obtained with both approaches. We performed the calculations for a representative set of 63 indirect nuclear spin-spin couplings ( 1 J(H-H), 2 J(H-H), 1 J(H-X) (X = C, Si, Ge, Sn, Pb), 1 J(H-X) (X = F, Cl, Br, I), 2 J(H-Hg), 3 J(C-Hg), 1 J(C-X) (X = Zn, Cd, Tl, Hg, Cu, Au, Ag), 2 J(N-Cd) (X = Zn, Cd, Tl, Hg, Cu, Au, Ag), and 1 J(N-X) (X = Cu, Au, Ag)) employing both types of the exchangecorrelation kernel. The relation between exact and fitted kernel calculation is plotted in Fig.…”
Section: Accuracy Of the New Approach Compared To The Reference Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation