1992
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.45.1722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relativistic and nonrelativistic finite-basis-set calculations of low-lying levels of hydrogenic atoms in intense magnetic fields

Abstract: A finite-basis-set method is used to calculate relativistic and nonrelativistic binding energies of an electron in a static Coulomb field and in magnetic fields of arbitrary strength (0 ( B & 10 G).The basis set is composed of products of Slaterand Landau-type functions, and it contains the exact solutions at both the Coulomb limit (B = 0) and the Landau limit (Z = 0). Relativistic variational collapse is avoided and highly accurate results are obtained with the basis set. The relativistic corrections obtained… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
46
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Relativistic calculations for the hydrogen atom and hydrogen-like ions were performed by Lindgren and Virtamo [22] and Chen and Goldman [23]. Our considerations are based on the work by Chen and Goldman [23] which contains results for the 1s and 2p −1 states for a broad range of magnetic field strengths.…”
Section: First Of All We Have To Check If the State 1smentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Relativistic calculations for the hydrogen atom and hydrogen-like ions were performed by Lindgren and Virtamo [22] and Chen and Goldman [23]. Our considerations are based on the work by Chen and Goldman [23] which contains results for the 1s and 2p −1 states for a broad range of magnetic field strengths.…”
Section: First Of All We Have To Check If the State 1smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our considerations are based on the work by Chen and Goldman [23] which contains results for the 1s and 2p −1 states for a broad range of magnetic field strengths. Interpolating their results for the 1s state and using well known scaling transformations we can conclude that in the least favorable case of Z = 10 relativistic corrections δE = (E relativistic − E non−relativistic )/ |E non−relativistic | have to be of the order 4 · 10 −4 for γ = 200 and 2 · 10 −4 for γ = 10 4 .…”
Section: First Of All We Have To Check If the State 1smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basis set of 78 radial B-splines of order k = 9 and 17 Legendre polynomials (of orders from 0 to 16) is enough to obtain all the results presented in Tables I − VI. [37,38] (they both coincide to all the presented digits) is given. The complete perturbation-theory result ∆EPT and the individual contributions are listed as well.…”
Section: Stationary Dirac Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the calculation of the low-lying states of a hydrogen atom in an ultra-high magnetic field (10 5 −10 9 T), which is the case for atoms in the atmosphere of white dwarfs and neutron stars, existent effective methods includes basis set method using different basis functions [3][4][5][6][7][8], eigenvalue analysis method [9][10][11], finite element method [12], adiabatic approximate method [13][14][15], and series method [16][17][18]. Among these methods, the series method introduced by Kravchenko and Liberman give the most accurate results for the low-lying spectra of hydrogen atom in a magnetic field [16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%