2010
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2009.0338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative Water Uptake Rate as a Criterion for Trickle Irrigation System Design: I. Coupled Source–Sink Steady Water Flow Model

Abstract: We have developed a new modeling approach for designing the geometry of trickle irrigation systems: root water uptake rate is treated as the unknown, i.e., sought after, quantity. It is determined from solutions to the linearized, steady‐water‐flow problem that describes the interaction between surface point (or line) sources and subsurface point (or line) sinks. We postulate that a sink that creates a maximum allowable suction defines an upper bound to the relative water uptake, and propose to use this upper … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To evaluate how the soil vertical heterogeneity (ß) can affect plant water uptake rates at various ratios between the cylinder radius (R^) and the rooting zone radius RQ (= ar^/l, where rî s the physical radius of the conceived rooting zone), we use the coupled source-sink model (Communar and Friedman, 2010a), According to this model, the MFP generated by a surface point source í^^ at {R,Z) = (0, 0) and a subsurface point sink $j¡ located at depth Z. (= azjl, in which z, is the physical depth) is [27] where $j,^ and $jj are the MFPs normalized with the source strength {q^^, and qj= qjq^^ is the a priori unknown relative water uptake rate (RWUR), The sink is simulated by using the solution for a steady subsurface point source, i,e., the value of $ .…”
Section: Unsteady Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To evaluate how the soil vertical heterogeneity (ß) can affect plant water uptake rates at various ratios between the cylinder radius (R^) and the rooting zone radius RQ (= ar^/l, where rî s the physical radius of the conceived rooting zone), we use the coupled source-sink model (Communar and Friedman, 2010a), According to this model, the MFP generated by a surface point source í^^ at {R,Z) = (0, 0) and a subsurface point sink $j¡ located at depth Z. (= azjl, in which z, is the physical depth) is [27] where $j,^ and $jj are the MFPs normalized with the source strength {q^^, and qj= qjq^^ is the a priori unknown relative water uptake rate (RWUR), The sink is simulated by using the solution for a steady subsurface point source, i,e., the value of $ .…”
Section: Unsteady Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nature ofthe conceived rooting zone (Communar and Friedman, 2010a) of soil dryness at its boundary and streamlines that meet the boundary and physically end there, where water is given up to the interior plant roots, was chosen for the sake of mathematical tractability. The choice of a single interior point sink rather than arrays of interior point or line sinks already provides a good workable model.…”
Section: Unsteady Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analytical solutions for steady infiltration from shallow circular ponds at the soil surface (Wooding, 1968; Warrick, 1985) and from subsurface and surface point sources (Raats, 1971; Philip, 1971) were found useful for designing the geometry of drip irrigation systems (Bresler, 1978; Amoozegar‐Fard et al, 1984; Revol et al (1997a, 1997b); Communar and Friedman, 2010a, 2010b, 2010c, 2010d, 2011). Different methods, such as the dripper (pond radius) method (Shani et al, 1987; Or, 1996; Revol et al, 1997a, 1997b; Yitayew et al, 1998) and a multiple‐disk approach (Smettem and Clothier, 1989; Lazarovitch et al, 2007) have been used for evaluating the two parameters α and K s of Gardner's relationship from in situ measurements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, we refer to the general case where the water uptake rate is smaller than the evaluated maximum due to, e.g., limiting evaporative conditions (and stomata closure) or a strong decrease in the local water conductance between the bulk soil and the root surface (Communar and Friedman, 2010a), To account for this circumstance, a dimensionless film resistance C, can be added to the sink interface. Such a "skin effect" causes a drop of A<3?…”
Section: Water Uptake Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An additional assumption, that plant roots extract water from the soil under conditions of maximum suction, was made in deriving the coupled source-sink model used for evaluating the temporal patterns of water uptake rates (WUR) under various intermittent irrigation scenarios. The steady version of this model provides useful results that describe the influence of the density and geometry of plants and water sources (Communar and Friedman, 2010a, 2010b, 2010cMeiri et al, 2011) and of soil vertical heterogeneity (Communar and Friedman, 2012) on the relative water uptake rate (RWUR, the ratio between water uptake and water application rates). In this study, we developed a modified water-uptake model.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%