2010
DOI: 10.1017/s0022112010002855
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative velocity of inertial particles in turbulent flows

Abstract: We present a model for the relative velocity of inertial particles in turbulent flows that provides new physical insight into this problem. Our general formulation shows that the relative velocity has contributions from two terms, referred to as the generalized acceleration and generalized shear terms, because they reduce to the well known acceleration and shear terms in the Saffman-Turner limit. The generalized shear term represents particles' memory of the flow velocity difference along their trajectories an… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
87
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
6
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, some numerical works have tested the analytically derived collision velocities and started to derive distributions of collision velocities, e.g. Carballido et al (2010); Pan and Padoan (2010); Hubbard (2012); Pan and Padoan (2013). We will come back to the treatment of grain velocities in the context of global disk models in § 4.2.…”
Section: Relative Velocitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, some numerical works have tested the analytically derived collision velocities and started to derive distributions of collision velocities, e.g. Carballido et al (2010); Pan and Padoan (2010); Hubbard (2012); Pan and Padoan (2013). We will come back to the treatment of grain velocities in the context of global disk models in § 4.2.…”
Section: Relative Velocitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large or integral scale L, which contains the energy in this flow, is thus apparently much larger than the vertical distance of the sensor from the boundary (h = 2 m) and plausibly the same as the longitudinal integral scale given as L = 180 m [2], see also [13], thus L/⌘ ⇡ 10 5 . In cascade applications, it may be more meaningful to assess the scale dependence of p(m) at large scales not in terms of multiples of ⌘ as in [8] and most other work [e.g., 20], but in terms of fractions of L. We will also express scale fractions l/L in terms of cascade bifurcation levels N needed to achieve equidimensional volumes l on a side:…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theories by Zaichik and Alipchenkov [11] et seq., and Pan and Padoan [8] et seq. have been shown to be promising in explaining the cause of particle clustering in terms of history effects, with helpful contributions from the traditional local centrifugation mechanism [2,4,10,13].…”
Section: Background and Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Thus, a fluid description for these particles would not be sufficient. The physical reason for a constant δv (St, l) at small l (for a given St) is that the relative velocity between nearby particles is dominated by their memory of the flow velocity difference they "saw" within a friction timescale in the past (Pan & Padoan 2010).…”
Section: Particles With St >mentioning
confidence: 99%