2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2009.02.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative value of magnetic resonance spectroscopy, magnetic resonance perfusion, and 2-(18F) fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography for detection of recurrence or grade increase in gliomas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, dynamic susceptibility contrast MR imaging showed a substantial false-positive rate, which was not the case with MR spectroscopya finding that points to an incremental value of MR spectroscopy in separating tumor recurrence and posttreatment injury (72).…”
Section: Special Reviewmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…However, dynamic susceptibility contrast MR imaging showed a substantial false-positive rate, which was not the case with MR spectroscopya finding that points to an incremental value of MR spectroscopy in separating tumor recurrence and posttreatment injury (72).…”
Section: Special Reviewmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Only 4 recent studies explicitly reported that patients with high-grade glioma were treated with temozolomide. 33,[38][39][40] Regarding imaging techniques and technologies, included studies generally followed guidelines by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (On-line Table 3). 42,43 All studies used stand-alone dedicated PET scanners except for 1 study, in which some patients underwent combined PET/CT instead of standalone PET.…”
Section: Study Selection and Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When considering both low-and high-grade gliomas, [16][17][18][19][21][22][23]27,32,33,40,41 sensitivity ranged between 0.23 and 0.95 and specificity ranged between 0.17 and 1.0. For high-grade gliomas, [16][17][18][19]27,34,35,39,41 sensitivity ranged between 0.18 and 1.00 and specificity ranged 0.25 and 1.0.…”
Section: Sensitivity Specificity Likelihood Ratios and Summary Rocmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, several authors have shown that perfusion-weighted MRI data are correlated with histological grade [12]. Indeed, perfusion MRI reportedly provides better information or at least the same information as a PET scan, with an excellent correlation between the two techniques [22]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%